New and old antipsychotics versus clozapine in a monkey model: adverse effects and antiamphetamine effects

Neuroleptic primed Cebus apella monkeys have proven reliable in screening antipsychotics for extrapyramidal side effect (EPS) potential in humans, and the ratio EPS liability/antiamphetamine efficacy ["therapeutic index" (TI)] has fit well with clinical results.

1) To find the TIs of one new (quetiapine), three potential [NNC 756 (dopamine (DA) D1 antagonist), NNC 22-0031 (alpha-1 adrenergic/5-HT2 serotonergic/DA D1 and D2 antagonist) and DOD 647 (DA D1 and D2 antagonist)] and three old antipsychotics (haloperidol, melperone and clozapine), 2) to test the model further and 3) to gain more insight as to clozapine's neuropharmacology.

Seven monkeys received haloperidol daily for 2 years; all were sensitized to dystonia. All drugs were given SC, in increasing doses until two animals had dystonia/other adverse effects (AE), and in decreasing doses with a fixed dose of dextroamphetamine producing motor unrest and stereotypies, to find the minimum significant antiamphetamine dose (AA). The ratio AE/AA = TI.

Excepting clozapine and DOD 647, all drugs induced dystonia. At 2-4 mg/kg, clozapine caused uncoordinated movements, myoclonic jerks and rough tremor; unlike dystonia, the syndrome was not alleviated but worsened by the anticholinergic, biperiden. DOD 647 up to 2 mg/kg had no adverse effects. The TIs of the new and potential antipsychotics were 3-5 versus 4 for clozapine and 1 for haloperidol and melperone, suggesting that like clozapine, these new drugs will not produce EPS at antipsychotic doses.