Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

[Advance directives in clinical practice].

J Vollmann1, I Knöchel-Schiffer

  • 1Lehrstuhl für Sozialmedizin, Sozialpsychiatrie und Medizinethik an der Evangelischen Fachhochschule Berlin. vollmann@ukbf.fu-berlin.de

Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)
|August 7, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Under which conditions are changes in the treatment of people under involuntary commitment justified during the COVID-19 pandemic? An ethical evaluation of current developments in Germany.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2020
Same author

Requirements for the implementation of open door policies in acute psychiatry from a mental health professionals' and patients' view: a qualitative interview study.

BMC psychiatry·2018
Same author

Immunological differences between insect venom-allergic patients with and without immunotherapy and asymptomatically sensitized subjects.

Allergy·2017
Same author

Treatment recommendations within the leeway of clinical guidelines: A qualitative interview study on oncologists' clinical deliberation.

BMC cancer·2017
Same author

Treating depression with sleep deprivation and consecutive sleep phase advance therapy.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
Same author

[Not Available].

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·2016
Same journal

Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)·2020
Same journal

Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)·2020
Same journal

Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)·2020
Same journal

[Not Available].

Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)·2016
Same journal

[Not Available].

Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)·2016
Same journal

[Not Available].

Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983)·2014
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Advance directives are underutilized in clinical practice despite patient and public support. Increased patient education on advance directives can enhance palliative care and respect end-of-life wishes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Law
  • Patient Autonomy

Context:

  • Advance directives (ADs) were developed in the US in the late 1960s to aid future medical decision-making for incapacitated patients.
  • Germany utilizes three primary forms of ADs: Patientenverfügungen, Betreuungsverfügungen, and Vorsorgevollmachten.
  • Empirical studies, predominantly from the US, have investigated the clinical implementation and stakeholder attitudes towards ADs.

Purpose:

  • To review empirical studies on the implementation and attitudes surrounding advance directives.
  • To analyze the gap between patient/public desire for AD use and actual clinical practice.
  • To highlight the potential of ADs in improving end-of-life care and respecting patient values.

Summary:

  • Despite strong patient and public support, advance directives are infrequently used in clinical settings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Physicians tend to discuss treatment procedures more frequently than end-of-life decisions with patients.
  • Informing patients about advance directives presents an opportunity to improve palliative care and uphold patient autonomy.
  • Impact:

    • Enhanced patient and public awareness of advance directives can lead to greater utilization.
    • Improved communication regarding end-of-life decisions can align medical practice with patient preferences.
    • Respecting patient choices through advance directives contributes to more ethical and patient-centered end-of-life care.