[Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: experience of three years]

Patients who are not able to eat do need tube feeding. The most preferred way of artificial enteral nutritional support is feeding via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. Head and neck cancer patients do represent a special group of patients needing a PEG. On the one hand at the time of admission to the hospital they are mainly undernourished. On the other hand the failure rate of placing a PEG is the highest among them. Furthermore in the perioperative period nasogastric tubes do cause a lot of complications in these settings. 188 PEG placements were carried out from July 1995 till November 1998.

head and neck cancer (n = 171), neurologic disorders (n = 17). PEG tubes were placed 76 times during intratracheal narcosis and 112 times following local anaesthesia. 39 times there was a prior abdominal surgery in our patients medical history. The pull-through, the push-wire and the introducer techniques were used. Beside the usual oro-gastric way of endoscopying (n = 163), 25 times the following alternative ways of entering the upper gastrointestinal tract were used: transnasal route (n = 4), through a Kleinsasser type direct laryngoscope (n = 7) and via the opened pharynx (n = 14). No immediate or late onset procedure related complications occurred. During a follow-up of 22,480 tubedays 26 minor (dermatitis n = 24, ulcer n = 2) and 8 major (abscess n = 4, perforation/peritonitis n = 3, stomach and bowel wall necrosis n = 1) complications occurred. The success rate of placing a PEG was 98.9%. In head and neck cancer patients placing a PEG is suggested when there is a need for at least a 7 days time tube-feeding. Using the described alternative ways, a PEG tube can be placed almost always. Because of the uncertain outcome, nutritional support via PEG tubes is suggested also in cachectic patients and in vegetative state as well.