Use of a common computerized program for echocardiogram archiving and reporting over a regional territory:...

The aims of this study were to optimize interlaboratory standardization of echocardiographic reporting (qualitative terms and quantitative parameters) and to evaluate the feasibility and clinical and research impact of collecting echocardiographic data in a standard computerized format over a geographical territory. In April 1992, a computer program of echocardiogram archiving and reporting (ARCE) was distributed at no cost to the 23 hospital echocardiographic laboratories operating in our region (Liguria). In April 1993 (1-year survey), 16 (70%) of the 23 hospital echo laboratories operating in our region were routinely using ARCE. In April 1997 (4-year survey ), 21 (87%) of the 24 echo laboratories were routinely using the system and 128,642 echocardiograms had been databased. ARCE is a powerful tool both for education and training in cardiac ultrasound and for undertaking multicenter studies by 95% of the users. Regarding the quality improvement process, we achieved 3 main goals: (1) a unique report format from 87% of Ligurian echo laboratories, which improved the communication between echocardiographers and other physicians; (2) development of specific, Ligurian population-based reference limits for M-mode and 2-dimensional quantitative parameters; and (3) interlaboratory comparison and standardization of both quantitative and semiquantitative evaluation of heart valve disease, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, valve prosthesis function, and left ventricular hypertrophy. Regarding the scientific activity in Liguria, 9 multicenter studies in which 15 Ligurian echo laboratories took part were organized and completed in 5 years. Our 5-year experience shows that it is possible to create a large database of echocardiographic data that uses a fast, easy-access, and easy-to-use program of echo archiving and reporting that contains standardized variables. The use of this program on a regional territory scale appeared feasible and useful both for educational and training purposes. In addition, it stimulated the quality improvement process in echocardiography as well as performance of epidemiologic and clinical multicenter studies.