Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

"Double exposure": how real is it?

W C Briggs

    Environmental Health Perspectives
    |August 11, 1999
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This commentary discusses the article "Double Exposure," addressing environmental health perspectives and potential impacts. It highlights the importance of considering multiple exposure pathways in environmental health research.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Diverse lobbyists help quash oxygen proposal.

    Medical products sales : MPS : the official journal of the American Surgical Trade Association·1986
    Same author

    Future of oxygen-saving devices is up in the air.

    Medical products sales : MPS : the official journal of the American Surgical Trade Association·1986
    Same journal

    A New Start.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental Health Sciences
    • Toxicology
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • The commentary critically examines the article "Double Exposure," published in Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP). It addresses the methodologies and conclusions presented in the original EHP article.
    • It provides a platform for scientific discourse, offering alternative viewpoints and elaborating on the complexities of environmental exposure assessments.

    Discussion:

    • The authors discuss the implications of the "Double Exposure" article for understanding cumulative environmental risks. They emphasize the need for integrated approaches in risk assessment.
    • Key points include the challenges in quantifying combined effects of multiple environmental stressors and the significance of considering vulnerable populations.

    Key Insights:

    • The commentary underscores the necessity of a holistic approach to environmental health, moving beyond single-agent assessments. It stresses the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • It highlights the need for robust scientific evidence and transparent communication in addressing public health concerns related to environmental exposures.
  • Outlook:

    • Future research should focus on developing advanced methodologies for assessing combined environmental exposures. This includes innovative epidemiological study designs and toxicological models.
    • The commentary calls for greater attention to policy implications, advocating for evidence-based regulations that account for cumulative environmental impacts to protect public health.