Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Analyzing Protein Dynamics Using Hydrogen Exchange Mass Spectrometry
Published on: November 29, 2013
Proton Binding to Humic Acids: Electrostatic and Intrinsic Interactions
Avena1, Koopal, van Riemsdijk WH
1Section of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, 6700 EC, The Netherlands
Abstract:
The proton adsorption behavior of eight humic acids (HA) and a fulvic acid (FA) was studied as a function of pH and KNO(3) concentration. The emphasis is on the comparison of the different humics with respect to their ion binding properties and on the comparison of two different models to describe the electrostatic interactions: the Donnan model and the impermeable sphere (IS) model. Viscosimetric data were used to estimate the hydrodynamic volumes and radii of the HA molecules. These data were incorporated in the electrostatic models and calculations could be carried out without any adjustable parameter. The Donnan model in combination with hydrodynamic volumes obtained by viscometry cannot adequately describe the electrostatic effects related to changes of the electrolyte concentration. This model leads to good prediction of the HA behavior if unrealistically large volumes are used for fulvics and unrealistically large volume-salt concentration dependencies are used for humics. The IS model can successfully reproduce experimental proton adsorption data with physically realistic radii. The good performance of the IS model and the poor performance of the Donnan model is directly related to the fact that the hydrodynamic volumes of the molecules are too small to allow for charge compensation within the molecular limits. The combination of viscometry with the IS model leads to a consistent description of the electrostatic in humics and to a consistent way of positioning the master curves. Therefore, the electrostatic potentials and the intrinsic affinity distributions of the different samples can be compared on an equal basis. The similarities in the intrinsic affinity distributions give faith for the possibility to develop a generic model to describe the ion binding to humics. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
12:55Quantification of Humic and Fulvic Acids in Humate Ores, DOC, Humified Materials and Humic Substance-Containing Commercial Products
Published on: March 18, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Hydrogen Bonds
Polyprotic Acids
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Hydrogen Bonds