Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Severity scoring and outcome assessment. Computerized predictive models and scoring systems.

P E Marik1, J Varon

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA. pem4@mhg.edu

Critical Care Clinics
|August 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of copper-oxide-treated soft and hard surfaces on the incidence of healthcare-associated infections: a two-phase study.

The Journal of hospital infection·2020
Same author

The clinical characteristics and hospital and post-hospital survival of patients with the obesity hypoventilation syndrome: analysis of a large cohort.

Obesity science & practice·2016
Same author

Raynaud's phenomenon-Correction.

Journal of general internal medicine·2016
Same author

Organ Donation Among Health Care Providers: Is Giving and Receiving Similar?

Transplantation proceedings·2015
Same author

Fluid therapy in 2015 and beyond: the mini-fluid challenge and mini-fluid bolus approach.

British journal of anaesthesia·2015
Same author

The demise of early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2015

Severity of illness scoring systems and standardized death ratios are crucial for ICU quality assessment. However, factors beyond care quality can influence these metrics, impacting their reliability for performance comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Health Services Research
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Severity of illness scoring systems and standardized death ratios are increasingly utilized to evaluate Intensive Care Unit (ICU) performance.
  • These metrics are often employed as indicators of healthcare quality and for benchmarking ICU outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review commonly used severity of illness scoring systems in ICUs.
  • To identify and discuss factors that can influence the predictive performance of these scoring systems.
  • To highlight limitations of these metrics when used for quality assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of established severity of illness scoring systems.
  • Analysis of factors impacting the accuracy and reliability of these systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the implications for ICU quality measurement.

    • Main Results:

    • Several severity of illness scoring systems are widely used in ICUs.
    • Numerous external factors, independent of care quality, can significantly affect scores and ratios.
    • These confounding factors challenge the direct interpretation of these metrics as sole indicators of care quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Severity of illness scoring systems and standardized death ratios require careful interpretation.
    • Factors unrelated to direct patient care quality can bias these performance indicators.
    • Further research and nuanced application are needed for accurate ICU quality assessment.