Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What develops in working memory? A life span perspective.

H L Swanson1

  • 1School of Education, University of California, Riverside 92521, USA. Lee.Swanson@ucr.edu

Developmental Psychology
|August 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reading research for students with LD: a meta-analysis of intervention outcomes.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A comparison of two reading interventions for children with reading disabilities.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

Treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: how important are internal and external validity?

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

Are mathematics disabilities due to a domain-general or a domain-specific working memory deficit?

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

A subgroup analysis of working memory in children with reading disabilities: domain-general or domain-specific deficiency?

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same journal

The frequency of childhood gender-nonconforming behavior in a nationally representative sample.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Linking childhood adversity and daily hassles to adolescent sleep behaviors: Diurnal cortisol as a mediating pathway.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Infants' expectations about caregivers' comforting behavior and associations with maternal depressive symptoms at 6, 9, and 12 months.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Nonsymbolic ratio and fraction magnitude processing predict fraction knowledge in early grades.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

The growing influence of the parental monitoring-peer affiliation pathway in early adolescence.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Employing a cohort-sequential design spanning 30 years to understand trajectories of maturity fears.

Developmental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Age-related differences in working memory (WM) are not specific but general. Performance declines across age groups in accessing and maintaining information, supporting a general capacity explanation for these working memory changes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Working memory (WM) capacity is crucial for cognitive functions.
  • Age-related changes in WM performance are well-documented but their underlying mechanisms remain debated.
  • Distinguishing between specific and general processing functions in age-related WM differences is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether age-related working memory (WM) span differences stem from specific or general processing functions.
  • To examine verbal and visuospatial WM performance across nine distinct age groups.
  • To analyze WM performance under initial, gain, and maintenance conditions to understand processing demands.

Main Methods:

  • Compared verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM) performance across nine age groups (6 to 57 years).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed WM under three conditions: initial (baseline), gain (cue-elicited improvement), and maintenance (sustained performance).
  • Utilized statistical analysis to determine independent contributions of gain and maintenance to age-related performance variance.

    • Main Results:

    • Age-related performance differences in working memory (WM) were observed across all tested conditions.
    • Significant performance disparities persisted among age groups in both gain and maintenance conditions.
    • Both gain (accessing new information) and maintenance (retaining existing information) conditions independently explained age-related variance in WM.

    Conclusions:

    • Age-related working memory (WM) differences are attributable to general capacity limitations rather than specific processing deficits.
    • These general capacity differences reflect the cognitive load associated with both accessing new information and maintaining existing information.
    • Findings support a unified model of cognitive aging where a general decline in processing capacity impacts various WM functions.