Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Brain activity differentiates face and object processing in 6-month-old infants.

M de Haan1, C A Nelson

  • 1Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, England. m.de-haan@ich.ucl.ac.uk

Developmental Psychology
|August 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of lymphocytic CD5 in the effects of ethanol on mesolimbic circuitry and ethanol consumption behavior.

Brain, behavior, and immunity·2026
Same author

Interconnected pathways link faecal microbiota plasma lipids and brain activity to childhood malnutrition related cognition.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Response to Letter to Editor: Comment on "The infant gut microbiome and cognitive development in malnutrition".

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2024
Same author

UNITY: A low-field magnetic resonance neuroimaging initiative to characterize neurodevelopment in low and middle-income settings.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2024
Same author

Corrigendum to "Preferential responses to faces in superior temporal and medial prefrontal cortex in three-year-old children" [Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 50 (2021) 100984].

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2022
Same author

Preferential responses to faces in superior temporal and medial prefrontal cortex in three-year-old children.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2021
Same journal

The frequency of childhood gender-nonconforming behavior in a nationally representative sample.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Linking childhood adversity and daily hassles to adolescent sleep behaviors: Diurnal cortisol as a mediating pathway.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Infants' expectations about caregivers' comforting behavior and associations with maternal depressive symptoms at 6, 9, and 12 months.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Nonsymbolic ratio and fraction magnitude processing predict fraction knowledge in early grades.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

The growing influence of the parental monitoring-peer affiliation pathway in early adolescence.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same journal

Employing a cohort-sequential design spanning 30 years to understand trajectories of maturity fears.

Developmental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Infants

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Adults exhibit distinct brain activation patterns for faces versus objects.
  • Understanding infant visual processing is crucial for developmental neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if infants show similar brain activation differences as adults for faces and objects.
  • To explore how familiarity and novelty are processed in infant visual recognition.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure brain activity in infants.
  • Analyzed specific ERP components like P400 and the negative component (Nc).
  • Examined the spatial and temporal characteristics of brain responses to faces and objects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Infants showed a shorter P400 latency for faces compared to objects, indicating early differentiation.
  • A larger negative component (Nc) amplitude was observed for familiar stimuli, suggesting recognition.
  • Novel stimuli elicited a larger slow wave at fronto-temporal electrodes, indicating novelty encoding.
  • The neural processing of familiarity varied topographically between faces and objects.

Conclusions:

  • Infant visual processing of faces and objects shares similarities with adults.
  • Experience with specific items and general category knowledge shape infant neural responses.
  • ERP measures provide insights into the developing brain's recognition and novelty encoding mechanisms.