Lipoprotein (a) metabolism estimated by nonsteady-state kinetics
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2026

Measuring the Rate of Lipolysis in Ex Vivo Murine Adipose Tissue and Primary Preadipocytes Differentiated In Vitro
Published on: March 17, 2023
K G Parhofer1, T Demant, M M Ritter
1Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. parhofer@med2.med.uni-muenchen.de
Abstract:
Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle with an additional apolipoprotein named apo(a). The concentration of Lp(a) in plasma is determined to a large extent by the size of the apo(a) isoform. Because elevated Lp(a) concentrations in plasma are associated with risk for premature coronary heart disease it is important to determine whether variations in production or catabolism mediate differences in Lp(a) concentration. We determined metabolic parameters of Lp(a) in 17 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or severe mixed hyperlipidemia by fitting a monoexponential function to the rebound of Lp(a) plasma concentration following LDL-apheresis. In 8 of those 17 patients this was done twice following two different aphereses. Although this approach allows one to estimate metabolic parameters without the use of a tracer, it requires several major assumptions such as that apheresis itself does not change production or catabolism of Lp(a) and that Lp(a) metabolism can be described by a single compartment. One apheresis decreased Lp(a) concentration by 59.1+/-8.3%. The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) was 0.16+/-0.12 d(-1) and production rate 6.27+/-5.26 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1). However, observed (concentration before first apheresis) and predicted steady-state concentrations differed considerably (more than 20%) in 9 of 17 patients, indicating that not all assumptions were fulfilled in all patients. Production rate but not FCR was correlated with Lp(a) plasma concentration (r2 = 0.43, P = 0.004) and molecular weight of apo(a) (r2 = 0.48, P = 0.011), which confirms radiotracer experiments showing that variations in Lp(a) plasma concentrations are due to differences in production not catabolism. When parameters were estimated twice in a subgroup of eight patients, satisfactory reproducibility was observed in six patients. Although parameters determined on two occasions correlated well, only FCR was concordant (intraclass correlation coefficient). Thus, despite the limitations arising from the assumptions implicit to this method, metabolic parameters of Lp(a) can be estimated from the rebound of plasma concentration following apheresis.
Related Concept Videos
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Michaelis-Menten Equation
Vmax represents the maximum achievable process rate, while KM, known as the Michaelis constant, signifies the drug concentration at which the process rate reaches half its maximum. This relationship between Vmax, KM, and Cp gives rise to three distinct...
Overview of Lipid Metabolism
Lipolysis: The Breakdown of Lipids:
Lipolysis is the process of breaking down lipids, particularly triglycerides, into glycerol and fatty acids. This process typically occurs in the adipose tissue and is triggered by various hormones, including glucagon and...
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Bioavailability and Protein-Drug Binding
To quantify the extent of bioavailability, pharmacologists often use a parameter called .
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion, mediated...

