Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Energy functions for protein design.

D B Gordon1, S A Marshall, S L Mayo

  • 1Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, MC 147-75, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Current Opinion in Structural Biology
|August 17, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of circulating total sFLT-1 to placental-specific sFLT-1 e15a in women with suspected preeclampsia.

Placenta·2022
Same author

Sulforaphane Bioavailability and Effects on Blood Pressure in Women with Pregnancy Hypertension.

Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)·2021
Same author

Sulforaphane improves vascular reactivity in mouse and human arteries after "preeclamptic-like" injury.

Placenta·2020
Same author

Corrigendum to "Sulforaphane improves syncytiotrophoblast mitochondrial function after in vitro hypoxic and superoxide injury" [Placenta 96 (2020) 44-54].

Placenta·2020
Same author

Sulforaphane improves syncytiotrophoblast mitochondrial function after in vitro hypoxic and superoxide injury.

Placenta·2020
Same author

Micropezidae (Diptera, Nerioidea) of Mauritius, with a description of Paraeurybata new genus.

Zootaxa·2019
Same journal

Tomogram exploration through template matching and deep learning.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

A comparative review of cryo-electron ptychography: Biological applications and future perspectives.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Metabolic disruptions through a three-dimensional genomic lens.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Collective variable design for biomolecular conformational dynamics.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Polymer scaling in protein crowding: From dilute coils to semidilute meshes.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Tuning the physicochemical properties of rationally designed protein-based biomolecular condensates.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
See all related articles

Computational protein design leverages energy functions to assess amino acid sequences for specific structures. Optimized force fields for design differ from those used in molecular dynamics simulations.

Area of Science:

  • Protein engineering
  • Computational biology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Computational approaches show significant promise in protein design.
  • Energy expressions are crucial for evaluating amino acid sequences against target protein structures.
  • Existing force fields for molecular mechanics and dynamics may not be optimal for design tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of specialized force fields in computational protein design.
  • To differentiate design-optimized force fields from those used in molecular dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing computational methods for protein design.
  • Employing energy expressions to score amino acid sequences.
  • Comparing force fields optimized for design versus those for molecular mechanics/dynamics.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Recent advancements in protein design demonstrate the effectiveness of computational strategies.
  • The choice of energy function and force field significantly impacts design success.
  • Force fields tailored for protein design yield different results compared to standard molecular mechanics force fields.

Conclusions:

  • Computational protein design is a rapidly advancing field with substantial potential.
  • Specialized energy expressions and force fields are critical for successful protein design.
  • Further research into optimizing force fields for design applications is warranted.