Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research ethics committees: a regional approach.

C C Macpherson1

  • 1St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies. Cheryl_Cox@sgu.edu

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
|August 18, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethics committees. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines.

Developing world bioethics·2003
Same author

Research ethics committee: getting started.

The West Indian medical journal·2002
Same author

Should the Declaration of Helsinki be revised?

The New England journal of medicine·1999
Same author

The ethics of AIDS vaccine trials.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1998

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) face challenges in developing regions due to varying interpretations and limited resources. A regional IRB network could improve ethical review uniformity and streamline procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Research Administration

Background:

  • International guidelines for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) provide a standard for medical research ethics.
  • IRB effectiveness varies due to differing interpretations influenced by local values.
  • Developing regions, particularly the Caribbean and Pan American regions, have limited IRB infrastructure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore challenges in establishing and maintaining effective IRBs in developing regions.
  • To propose solutions for enhancing ethical review processes in resource-limited settings.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing national and international IRB guidelines.
  • Identification of obstacles specific to developing regions (e.g., language, literacy, resources).
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchCouncil for International Organizations of Medical Sciences

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Multinational consensus exists on fundamental IRB guidelines, but implementation varies.
  • Developing regions face significant hurdles including resource limitations and diverse value systems.
  • A scarcity of IRBs is noted in the Caribbean and Pan American regions.

Conclusions:

  • Regional IRB networks could foster more consistent ethical reviews in developing countries.
  • Such networks may simplify IRB procedures and improve overall research ethics oversight.