Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Invited commentary: propensity scores.

M M Joffe1, P R Rosenbaum

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6021, USA.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|August 24, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Matching One Sample According to Two Criteria in Observational Studies.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2023
Same author

Development of a measure of family-centred care for resource-poor South African settings: the experience of using a modified version of the MPOC-20.

Child: care, health and development·2008
Same author

Confounding by indication: the case of calcium channel blockers.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2008
Same author

Correlation between pulse wave velocity and other measures of arterial stiffness in chronic kidney disease.

Clinical nephrology·2007
Same author

Assessment of differences in HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 allele mismatches among African-American and non-African-American recipients of deceased kidney transplants.

Transplantation proceedings·2007
Same author

Matching and thick description in an observational study of mortality after surgery.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2003

Propensity scores help balance observed covariates in cohort studies but may not balance unobserved ones. This review covers propensity score uses, limitations, and statistical theory, introducing new applications in case-cohort studies.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Observational Studies

Background:

  • Propensity scores estimate the probability of treatment exposure based on observed covariates.
  • In cohort studies, propensity scores balance observed covariates between treated and control groups.
  • Unlike random assignment, propensity scores may not balance unobserved covariates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the applications and limitations of propensity scores in epidemiological research.
  • To provide a concise overview of the statistical theory underpinning propensity scores.
  • To introduce novel uses of propensity scores within case-cohort study designs.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on propensity score methodology.
  • Outline of core statistical concepts related to propensity score estimation and utilization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development and presentation of a new application for propensity scores in case-cohort studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Propensity scores effectively balance observed covariates but not unobserved ones.
    • A comprehensive review of propensity score applications and their inherent limitations.
    • Introduction of a novel method for employing propensity scores in case-cohort studies.

    Conclusions:

    • Propensity scores are valuable tools for addressing confounding in observational studies.
    • Researchers must be aware of the limitations regarding unobserved confounders.
    • The study contributes new insights into the application of propensity scores for case-cohort designs.