Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry.

K Mossberg1, C Willman, M A Topor

  • 1Department of Physical Therapy, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-1028, USA.

Spinal Cord
|August 24, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Asynchronous arm cranking produced greater power and longer test times compared to synchronous. All participants preferred the asynchronous method, suggesting implications for training and functional mobility.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhanced Risk Stratification for Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Children's Oncology Group Report.

Leukemia·2024
Same author

The effect of a radiant heat dressing on pressure ulcers.

Journal of wound care·2002
Same author

Exploring the use of an alginate dressing for diabetic foot ulcers.

Journal of wound care·2002
Same author

A patient-oriented health status measure in outpatient rehabilitation.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2002
Same author

Problematic WHO reclassification of myelodysplastic syndromes. Members of the International MDS Study Group.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2000
Same author

Patient and tumor characteristics of colon cancers with microsatellite instability: a population-based study.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2000

Area of Science:

  • Exercise Physiology
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Arm crank ergometry is a common method for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness.
  • Previous research has not directly compared synchronous and asynchronous arm cranking techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the physiological responses to asynchronous versus synchronous arm cranking.
  • To evaluate subject preference for different arm cranking methods.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative research design was used with 17 participants (11 with paraplegia, 6 without).
  • Participants performed two maximal arm crank graded exercise tests: one asynchronous and one synchronous.
  • Physiological measures included heart rate, oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, and blood lactate levels.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Asynchronous cranking resulted in significantly greater power output and longer test durations.
  • Higher post-test blood lactate levels were observed with asynchronous cranking.
  • All participants expressed a preference for asynchronous over synchronous arm cranking.

Conclusions:

  • Despite limited statistically significant physiological differences, subjective preference indicates asynchronous cranking may be more effective.
  • The findings suggest that the mode of arm cranking has implications for testing, training, and functional locomotion, particularly for individuals with lower extremity impairments.