Related Experiment Videos
Surgical feeding gastrostomy: are we overdoing it?
Summary
Feeding gastrostomy outcomes vary significantly. This study found the procedure is most beneficial for patients with head/neck cancers, but often futile for those with severe systemic diseases and high APACHE II scores.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Outcomes
- Patient Prognosis
Background:
- Feeding gastrostomy is a common procedure for nutritional support.
- Determining patient benefit versus futility is crucial for selective application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze feeding gastrostomy outcomes in a community teaching hospital.
- To identify patient subgroups who benefit from or are unlikely to benefit from gastrostomy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 100 consecutive feeding gastrostomy patients.
- Patients categorized by indication: neurologic disorders, debilitating systemic disease, or obstructive malignancy.
- APACHE II scores analyzed for survival prediction.
Main Results:
- Overall 30-day mortality was 41%.
- Survival rates varied by indication: 70% (neurologic), 15% (systemic disease), 85% (malignancy).
- High APACHE II scores (>15) in systemic disease patients predicted futility.
Conclusions:
- Feeding gastrostomy should be selectively performed.
- Severe systemic disease combined with high APACHE II scores indicates futility.
- Gastrostomy offers significant benefit for head and neck cancer patients.