Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Speech processing in radiology.

W Hundt1, O Stark, B Scharnberg

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.

European Radiology
|August 25, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The pararectus approach in acetabular fracture fixation: evidence of reproducibility and learnability.

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society·2026
Same author

Effect of rheumatoid arthritis and age on metacarpal bone shaft geometry and density: A longitudinal pQCT study in postmenopausal women.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2019
Same author

Diagnostic Accuracy of Full-Body Linear X-Ray Scanning in Multiple Trauma Patients in Comparison to Computed Tomography.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·2015
Same author

Mapping tibiofemoral gonarthrosis: an MRI analysis of non-traumatic knee cartilage defects.

The British journal of radiology·2015
Same author

Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: novel technique for preserving the ruptured ACL.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2014
Same author

Evaluation of articular cartilage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using T2* mapping at different time points at 3.0 Tesla MRI: a feasibility study.

Skeletal radiology·2011
Same journal

Body composition's effect on the bone-vascular axis of osteoporosis discovered in AI-based CT analysis of COPD patients.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: pelvic floor imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

STIR or T2-Dixon? A false dilemma in musculoskeletal MRI.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: uterine cancers-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive quantification for more reproducible amyloid PET interpretation.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

APEX-NET: automated pancreatic evaluation network using early non-contrast CT.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

The Philips speech recognition system (SP 6000) shows a high recognition rate (up to 95%) and significantly reduces report turnaround time, despite initial longer dictation periods compared to tape-based systems.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Radiology Workflow Optimization

Background:

  • Traditional tape-based dictation systems present challenges in report turnaround time.
  • Advancements in speech recognition technology offer potential improvements in clinical documentation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the Philips speech recognition system SP 6000 for radiologists.
  • Assess its recognition rate, learning curve, and time efficiency compared to tape-based systems.

Main Methods:

  • Four radiologists used the Philips SP 6000 for various radiological reports (interventional radiology, MRI, CT).
  • Recognition and improvement rates were tracked across learning phases.
  • Dictation and correction times were compared with a tape-based system.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Average initial recognition rate was 79.6%, improving to 92.5% after the third adaptation.
  • Initial dictation/correction time was 16.8 min, decreasing to 8.1 min post-adaptation.
  • Despite longer individual dictation times (8.1 min vs. 3.6 min), the overall report completion time was significantly shorter (15 min vs. 1 day).

Conclusions:

  • The Philips SP 6000 system demonstrates substantial learning potential, with recognition rates reaching up to 95%.
  • While dictation time is longer than traditional methods, the system drastically reduces overall report turnaround time.
  • Speech recognition technology offers a viable solution for efficient radiological reporting.