Related Experiment Videos

Agreement and disagreement between "metabolic viability" and "contractile reserve" in akinetic myocardium

J H Cornel1, J J Bax, A Elhendy

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Medical Center Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

Insights

Assessing myocardial viability in chronic coronary artery disease is crucial. Dobutamine echocardiography shows good agreement with SPECT imaging but may underestimate viability compared to F18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Assessing myocardial viability in akinetic segments of patients with chronic coronary artery disease and reduced left ventricular function is critical for treatment decisions.
  • Viability is characterized by intact perfusion, preserved metabolism, and contractile reserve, though these may not all be present simultaneously.
  • Contractile reserve is often less preserved than metabolic activity or perfusion in viable myocardium.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly compare perfusion imaging (thallium-201 SPECT), metabolic imaging (F18-fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT), and contractile reserve assessment (low-dose dobutamine echocardiography) in akinetic myocardium.
  • To evaluate the agreement between these imaging modalities in identifying viable myocardial segments.

Main Methods:

  • Studied 40 patients with chronic coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular function (mean ejection fraction 31%).
  • Utilized thallium-201 SPECT for perfusion, F18-fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT for metabolism, and low-dose dobutamine echocardiography for contractile reserve assessment.
  • Analyzed akinetic myocardial segments identified by resting echocardiography.

Main Results:

  • Of 165 akinetic segments, 154 showed hypoperfusion. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging revealed perfusion-metabolism mismatches in 41 segments.
  • Contractile reserve was present in 80% of segments with a perfusion-metabolism mismatch versus 6% with a match (P < .0005).
  • Agreement between SPECT and dobutamine echocardiography was 87%; however, dobutamine echocardiography underestimated viability in 27% of segments identified as viable by SPECT.

Conclusions:

  • SPECT and dobutamine echocardiography demonstrate good agreement for assessing myocardial viability.
  • A significant number of viable segments on SPECT do not exhibit contractile reserve, suggesting dobutamine echocardiography may underestimate viability compared to F18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos