Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validation of bioassays for quality control.

D Lansky1

  • 1Searle, Skokie, IL 60077, USA.

Developments in Biological Standardization
|August 27, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relationships among patient hostility, anger expression, depression, and the working alliance in a work hardening program.

Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine·2008
Same author

Strip-plot designs, mixed models, and comparisons between linear and non-linear models for microtitre plate bioassays.

Developments in biologicals·2002
Same author

Steering quality improvement in healthcare--panel discussion.

Journal of AHIMA·2000
Same author

Validity of the pain anxiety symptoms scale (PASS): prediction of physical capacity variables.

Pain·2000
Same author

A conversation with David Lansky PhD.

Managed care interface·1999
Same author

Measuring what matters to the public.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·1998
Same journal

International challenges and public policy issues.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

Regulation of biologicals in China.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

ICH activities on biotech topics.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

Regulation of biologicals in the European Union.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

Standardisation and licensing of combination vaccines based on DTP.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
Same journal

Control of foot-and-mouth disease by vaccination.

Developments in biological standardization·2000
See all related articles

This study introduces a split-block design to improve biological assay quality control by accurately estimating assay variation. This method enhances the reliability of parallelism tests and relative potency estimations for better lot release decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Bioassay validation
  • Quality control in pharmaceutical development

Background:

  • Biological assays are critical for quality control, requiring accurate estimation of assay variation.
  • Location effects on 96-well plates and serial dilutions complicate variation estimation.
  • Robust validation of bioassays must account for both between- and within-assay variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a statistical approach for more accurate estimation of assay variation in biological assays.
  • To address challenges posed by location effects and serial dilutions in bioassay data.
  • To provide guidance on appropriate methods for validating bioassays and combining potency estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of a split-block design to manage location effects on 96-well plates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of data considering blocks as consistent regions within a plate.
  • Discussion of randomization challenges and the role of robotics in bioassay laboratories.

    • Main Results:

    • The split-block design effectively removes some location effects and quantifies others as assay variation.
    • This approach yields appropriate measures of assay variation crucial for preliminary tests and inference.
    • The study highlights the inappropriateness of standard weighted approaches when between-assay variation is substantial.

    Conclusions:

    • A split-block design offers improved accuracy and precision for estimating assay variation in biological assays.
    • Accurate measures of variation are essential for reliable quality control, including parallelism testing and potency estimation.
    • For combining relative potency estimates, a simple average and standard deviation is recommended when between-assay variation is significant.