Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Therapeutic equivalence: all studies are not created equal.

R Hatala1, A Holbrook, C H Goldsmith

  • 1Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. hatala@fhs.csu.mcmaster.ca

The Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology = Journal Canadien De Pharmacologie Clinique
|August 31, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating therapeutic equivalence requires assessing statistical significance and clinical importance. Clinicians can then choose treatments based on factors like cost or convenience after equivalence is confirmed.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The first step in visual diagnosis: a study of novices developing the ability to distinguish normal from abnormal cases.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2025
Same author

Profiles and trajectories of executive functioning in young children with Down syndrome.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2023
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Association of General Surgeons Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons Canadian Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Society Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons: Victoria, BC Sept. 10-13, 2009.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Concentration of apelin inversely correlates with atrial fibrillation burden.

Bratislavske lekarske listy·2021
Same author

Proposal for complementary targeted public health anti-epidemic measures during the pandemics of COVID-19.

Bratislavske lekarske listy·2020

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacoeconomics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • With numerous treatment options, assessing therapeutic equivalence is crucial for clinical decision-making.
  • Standard superiority and true equivalence trials are the primary study designs for establishing therapeutic equivalence.
  • Clinicians must consider both statistical significance and clinical importance, defined by the minimally important difference, when evaluating study results.

Observation:

  • Therapeutic equivalence is determined by analyzing statistical significance and the minimally important difference.
  • The minimally important difference represents the smallest outcome difference impacting patient health status.
  • Both standard superiority and true equivalence trials are employed to assess if treatments are comparable.

Findings:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Equivalence is established by examining statistical significance alongside the minimally important difference.
  • Once therapeutic equivalence is confirmed, other factors influence treatment selection.
  • Clinicians may prefer a therapy for reasons beyond efficacy and safety, such as cost or administration convenience.

Implications:

  • Understanding therapeutic equivalence aids in selecting optimal treatments from a growing number of options.
  • The concept of minimally important difference is key for interpreting clinical trial outcomes.
  • Evidence-based selection of therapies can lead to improved patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.