Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Remembering and forgetting as context discrimination.

E J Capaldi1, I Neath

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1364, USA.

Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)
|May 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The sequential view: From rapidly fading stimulus traces to the organization of memory and the abstract concept of number.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Contextualism: Is the act in context the adequate metaphor for scientific psychology?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

The relation between memory and expectancy as revealed by percentage and sequence of reward investigations.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.

Psychological bulletin·2010
Same author

The world wide web: exploring a new advertising environment.

Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society·2009
Same journal

Transition and renewal at <i>Learning & Memory</i>.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Experimentally induced encoding variability influences mnemonic discrimination: evidence from human behavioral data and global matching models.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Temporal proximity to sleep determines emotional memory interference.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Item recognition is associated with gut microbiota composition in healthy humans.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Memory-based similar lure rejections promote subsequent memory for relative recency.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Chronic stress enhances threat responding and impacts fear extinction.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Performance does not always reflect learning or memory. A lack of performance may indicate a failure to retrieve information due to differing conditions, not true forgetting. This highlights latent learning and memory as discrimination problems.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • The distinction between learning and performance was established by Blodgett's (1929) latent learning experiments.
  • A lack of performance does not necessarily indicate a lack of learning or memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize that performance failures do not equate to a lack of learning or memory.
  • To propose that forgetting is a failure of performance due to retrieval cues, not memory loss.

Main Methods:

  • Review of experimental findings on learning and memory tasks in animals and humans.
  • Analysis of conditions affecting performance in Pavlovian and instrumental learning.
  • Examination of memory retrieval based on stimulus conditions at encoding and testing.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Failure to perform under one set of conditions can be alleviated under others, suggesting latent learning.
  • Forgetting is reframed as a failure of performance due to inadequate retrieval cues, not memory decay.
  • Memory is viewed as a discrimination problem, where retrieval depends on cue-target distinctiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Memory retrieval is context-dependent; altered stimulus conditions explain performance variations.
  • This discrimination-based approach offers a more useful framework for understanding memory and learning than true forgetting models.
  • Investigating conditions that improve performance is crucial for a fundamental understanding of learning and memory.