Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tumor reconstruction.

F J Hornicek1, M C Gebhardt, J I Sorger

  • 1Orthopaedic Oncology Unit, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. fhornicek@partners.org

The Orthopedic Clinics of North America
|September 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Management of metastatic humeral fractures: Variations according to orthopedic subspecialty, tumor characteristics.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2017
Same author

Quality of life after resection of a chordoma of the mobile spine.

The bone & joint journal·2017
Same author

The stability of the hip after the use of a proximal femoral endoprosthesis for oncological indications: analysis of variables relating to the patient and the surgical technique.

The bone & joint journal·2017
Same author

Functional and oncological outcome after surgical resection of the scapula and clavicle for primary chondrosarcoma.

Musculoskeletal surgery·2016
Same author

What Factors are Associated With Quality Of Life, Pain Interference, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients With Metastatic Bone Disease?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2016
Same author

Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours : a modified system Including biological and expandable reconstructions.

The bone & joint journal·2014
Same journal

New Technologies.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Recent Innovations and Applications of Custom 3D Printed Cages for Critical Bone Defects in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Application of New Technologies: Patient-specific Instrumentation and Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Foot and Ankle.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Robotic-Assisted Latissimus Dorsi Transfers Around the Shoulder.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Blood Flow Restriction Therapy for the Upper Extremity: An Emerging Adjunct for Patient Recovery and Rehabilitation.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Emerging Roles for 3 Dimensional Printing in Orthopedics: Applications, Evidence, and Future Directions.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

This study reviews bony defect reconstruction after tumor removal, analyzing various methods used at Massachusetts General and Children

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Bony defects following tumor resection present significant reconstructive challenges.
  • Effective reconstruction is crucial for functional restoration and patient outcomes.
  • Various surgical techniques exist for addressing these complex defects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare different methods for reconstructing bony defects after tumor resections.
  • To present the authors' treatment goals, algorithms, and the rationale behind their approach.
  • To analyze outcomes based on data from Massachusetts General and Children's Hospitals.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of bony defect reconstruction techniques.
  • Retrospective analysis of patient data from Massachusetts General and Children's Hospitals.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of treatment algorithms and decision-making processes.

    • Main Results:

    • Discussion of the efficacy and limitations of diverse reconstruction strategies.
    • Presentation of institutional experiences and outcomes.
    • Analysis of factors influencing the choice of reconstruction method.

    Conclusions:

    • The optimal method for bony defect reconstruction depends on individual patient and defect characteristics.
    • A clear treatment algorithm aids in achieving successful functional and oncologic outcomes.
    • Continued evaluation of reconstruction techniques is essential for advancing patient care.