Related Experiment Videos
Progressive visual field defects from experimental glaucoma: measurements with white and colored stimuli
R S Harwerth1, E L Smith, M Chandler
1College of Optometry, University of Houston, Texas 77204-6052, USA. rharwerth@uh.edu
Purpose:
Our purpose was to study the effects of using monochromatic test stimuli to measure the relative rate of progression of visual field defects caused by experimental glaucoma.
Methods:
Visual field measurements were obtained by static perimetry from trained macaque monkeys with laser-induced, unilateral glaucoma. The visual field defects were assessed by perimetric (global) indices derived from comparisons of experimental visual fields to the expected normal fields of monkeys. Three types of perimetry stimuli were used, the conventional white Goldmann III and two monochromatic (460 and 620 nm) Goldmann V test stimuli. The relationships between field defects with white and monochromatic stimuli were investigated by linear regression of the Z-scores for the perimetric indices.
Results:
The correlations between the mean deviation global indices for chromatic vs. white stimuli were high (r > 0.9) and linear throughout the period of progression of field defects. The slopes of the regression lines typically were greater than unity, indicating that statistical significance was higher for visual field defects measured with chromatic stimuli than with white light stimuli. The higher significance level for defects measured with chromatic stimuli was not explained by a difference in visual thresholds, because the thresholds with chromatic and white light were highly correlated across the full range of visual field defects, from initial-onset to end-state. This result also suggests that the early detection of glaucomatous visual defects with monochromatic stimuli does not reflect a selective loss of retinal ganglion cells.
Conclusions:
Although these experiments do not suggest an alternative neural mechanism for the clinical utility of perimetry with chromatic light for the early detection of glaucoma, it is very likely that the combinations of neural and/or analytical factors that explain the utility of perimetry with chromatic stimuli will also provide an explanation for the higher sensitivities in identifying early glaucoma reported for other prototype stimuli.