Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Characterization of two Bacillus probiotics.

D H Green1, P R Wakeley, A Page

  • 1School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdom.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology
|September 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multi-centre real-world evaluation of AI-assisted organ at risk contouring on radiotherapy treatment planning workflows.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same author

Rapid review: Three ways local government could improve inequality, public health and wellbeing outcomes in supported housing in England.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Creating a healthier economy: A rapid evidence review of inequalities in flexible working arrangements in the UK.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Age- and estrous-dependent effects of psilocybin in rats.

Neuropharmacology·2025
Same author

Pregnancy outcomes following medical vs surgical treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2025
Same author

Opioid analgesics: Managing the predictable.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2025
Same journal

High-throughput viral enumeration of aquatic ecosystems via flow cytometry.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same journal

Gut microbiota as key mediators of animal acclimation to temperature changes: mechanisms and interventions.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same journal

Assessing the effects of ocean alkalinity enhancement on marine protozoa: physiological dynamics and transcriptomic responses.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same journal

The <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> collagen-binding protein Cnm enhances early biofilm formation with <i>Candida albicans</i>.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same journal

Response of <i>Zostera japonica</i> rhizosphere bacteria to ocean acidification.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same journal

Dynamics of clinical <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> strains over the COVID-19 pandemic in Qingdao, China.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
See all related articles

Two popular oral probiotics, Enterogermina and Biosubtyl, were unexpectedly found not to contain Bacillus subtilis. Further characterization revealed neither preparation contained the advertised bacterial species.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Probiotics
  • Bacterial Identification

Background:

  • Bacillus subtilis is a recognized oral probiotic agent.
  • Commercial probiotic supplements are widely used for gastrointestinal health.
  • Accurate labeling of probiotic contents is crucial for consumer trust and efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To verify the bacterial content of two commercial probiotic preparations, Enterogermina and Biosubtyl.
  • To determine if these preparations contain the labeled Bacillus subtilis.
  • To assess the accuracy of probiotic product labeling.

Main Methods:

  • Physiological characterization of bacterial isolates.
  • Genetic analysis of bacterial strains.
  • Comparison of identified bacteria with the labeled species (Bacillus subtilis).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Neither Enterogermina nor Biosubtyl contained Bacillus subtilis.
  • The bacterial species identified in the preparations differed from B. subtilis.
  • Significant discrepancies were found between product labels and actual bacterial contents.

Conclusions:

  • Commercial probiotic products may not contain the advertised bacterial species.
  • There is a need for stringent quality control and regulatory oversight for probiotic supplements.
  • Consumers may be misled by inaccurate probiotic labeling.