Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Professional competence in medicine.

L Southgate1

  • 1Centre for Health Informatics and Medical Education, Royal Free and UCL Medical School.

Hospital Medicine (London, England : 1998)
|September 7, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The threat of the dyscompetent resident: A plea to make the implicit more explicit!

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2014
Same author

Teaching general practitioners to teach.

Medical teacher·2014
Same author

An evaluation of a computer based education program for the diagnosis and management of dementia in primary care. An international study of the transcultural adaptations necessary for European dissemination.

Medical teacher·2008
Same author

Corridor consultations and the medical microbiological record: is patient safety at risk?

Journal of clinical pathology·2002
Same author

When enough is enough: a conceptual basis for fair and defensible practice performance assessment.

Medical education·2002
Same author

The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures.

Medical education·2002
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Medical professional competence is under scrutiny due to increased government and media attention on doctor performance and patient outcomes. This paper examines the evolving landscape of medical self-regulation and the shifting roles of key institutions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Healthcare Policy
  • Professional Regulation

Background:

  • Recent government and media focus on physician performance and patient safety.
  • Questions raised regarding the medical profession's capacity for self-regulation.
  • Evolving roles of regulatory bodies, universities, and professional colleges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide context for understanding significant changes in medical professional competence and regulation.
  • To analyze the impact of external scrutiny on medical self-governance.
  • To explore the shifting responsibilities of various stakeholders in maintaining medical standards.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of policy documents and media reports.
  • Analysis of historical trends in medical regulation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discourse analysis of professional and governmental statements.
  • Main Results:

    • Increased external oversight is challenging traditional medical self-regulation.
    • Stakeholder roles are being redefined in response to performance concerns.
    • A complex interplay exists between professional autonomy and public accountability.

    Conclusions:

    • The medical profession faces a critical juncture in adapting to new regulatory demands.
    • Collaboration between the state, universities, and professional bodies is essential.
    • Maintaining public trust requires transparent and effective mechanisms for ensuring professional competence.