Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Driving simulation study: bilateral array multifocal versus bilateral AMO monofocal intraocular lenses.

K A Featherstone1, J R Bloomfield, A J Lang

  • 1Clinical Research Department, Allergan Surgical Products, Irvine, California, USA.

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|September 7, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ACTing with Mindfulness for Pain (AMP): A pilot randomized controlled trial of an integrated acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness meditation program.

Behaviour research and therapy·2025
Same author

Intolerance of uncertainty as a mediator of reductions in worry in a cognitive behavioral treatment program for generalized anxiety disorder.

Journal of anxiety disorders·2015
Same author

Trauma Exposure in Anxious Primary Care Patients.

Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment·2013
Same author

Reactivity to interoceptive cues in nocturnal panic.

Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry·2002
Same author

Age-related changes in motor control during articulator visuomotor tracking.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2001
Same author

Late occurrence of diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2001

Driving performance with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and monofocal IOLs showed no consistent differences in low-contrast conditions. While some specific tasks favored monofocal IOLs, overall driving safety was comparable between the two IOL types.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Vision Science
  • Ophthalmic Surgery

Background:

  • Intraocular lenses (IOLs) are crucial for vision restoration after cataract surgery.
  • Multifocal IOLs aim to provide clear vision at multiple distances, potentially impacting visual function in various conditions.
  • Monofocal IOLs provide clear vision at a single distance, often requiring corrective eyewear for other tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the driving performance of patients with bilateral Array multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) versus bilateral AMO monofocal IOLs.
  • To evaluate driving performance under simulated low-contrast environmental conditions, including night driving and fog.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, test-operator-masked, parallel-group study involving 33 patients in each IOL group.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Driving performance was assessed using the Iowa Driving Simulator under conditions of reduced visibility.
  • Key performance measures included sign recognition, hazard detection, and avoidance behaviors, alongside contrast acuity and sensitivity tests.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant differences in driving performance were observed in 86.7% of comparisons between the multifocal and monofocal IOL groups.
    • The monofocal IOL group demonstrated statistically significant better performance in specific scenarios: nighttime warning sign recognition and fog sign recognition distances.
    • While correlations between low-contrast visual acuity and driving performance were significant, they were weak and not predictive.

    Conclusions:

    • Statistically significant differences in specific driving tasks were detected between multifocal and monofocal IOL groups.
    • However, the study concluded that there are no consistent differences in overall driving performance and safety between the two IOL types under low-contrast conditions.