Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
The inverse relationship between cost and survival in the critically ill cancer patient
Abstract:
The enormous cost of intensive multiple organ system support is apparent from patient or third party charges of $1500--$2000 per day exclusive of physician fees sampled during a retrospective review of 700 consecutive recent admissions to the Critical Care Facility of Memorial Cancer Center. Mortality rates of 49% for general medical, 54% for lymphoma or leukemia, and 20% for surgery patients suggest the need for a selective admission and discharge policy which concentrates financial and personnel resources on those for whom there remains a reasonable chance of worthwhile palliation, if not cure, of their malignancy. An informal policy of this kind may have contributed to a 10% increase in hospital discharges and a reduction of in-unit mortality from 22--18% when compared to 1035 earlier unselected admissions. A modified version of the classification suggested by the Critical Care Committee of the Massachusetts General Hospital has been adopted for use at this institution. A similar approach by other cancer centers is urged so that predictive indices based on prognosis of the underlying disease as well as physiological status may be developed. Otherwise, cost-benefit analysis by third party payers or government will become an unavoidable, and less satisfactory, alternative.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach

