Surgery for the treatment of medically intractable infantile spasms: a cautionary case

The most appropriate time to consider cortical resection to treat medically intractable infantile spasms has not been clearly defined. The risks that need to be reconciled to make this decision are: What is the risk of loss of developmental potential if surgery is delayed too long versus what is the risk of unnecessary surgery if it is done too soon. We propose that, in addition to evaluation of seizures, developmental assessment is a key factor in the surgical decision. The case report illustrates this concept.

HC had onset of seizures at 9 days of age and developed infantile spasms due to mild right hemimegancephaly. At 19 months, she was having up to 50 seizures/day and was evaluated and approved for right hemispherectomy but surgery was delayed. Despite the seizures, her development had been much better than most patients with hemimegencephaly and infantile spasms. At 25 months her seizure control was much improved but she had several seizures/week. EcoG at the time of surgery did not demonstrate the usual abnormalities so no resection was performed. She has had only 5 seizures in the 2(1/2) year since.

(a) Hemimegalencephaly is not always associated with severe mental retardation; (b) normal or near-normal development may, in some cases, indicate the possibility of medical control of seizures as the child grows; (c) a localized developmental brain abnormality in a child with intractable seizures should not necessarily lead to cortical resection; and (d) when a child meets developmental milestones, it may be appropriate to delay surgical intervention.