Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Automated diagnosis of data-model conflicts using metadata.

R O Chen1, R B Altman

  • 1Stanford University, California, USA. altman@smistanfod.edu

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
|September 24, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Computational biologists can now systematically diagnose data-model conflicts using a new methodology. This approach aids in resolving discrepancies between experimental data and scientific model predictions, improving research accuracy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whole genome sequencing-powered ctDNA sequencing for breast cancer detection.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
Same author

Pharmacogenomics-Based Point-of-Care Clinical Decision Support Significantly Alters Drug Prescribing.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2017
Same author

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems for interpreting complex medical datasets.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2017
Same author

The Pharmacogenomics Research Network Translational Pharmacogenetics Program: Outcomes and Metrics of Pharmacogenetic Implementations Across Diverse Healthcare Systems.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2017
Same author

The International SSRI Pharmacogenomics Consortium (ISPC): a genome-wide association study of antidepressant treatment response.

Translational psychiatry·2016
Same author

Estimation of Maximum Recommended Therapeutic Dose Using Predicted Promiscuity and Potency.

Clinical and translational science·2016
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Scientific Computing

Background:

  • Complex computational processes in biology often lead to discrepancies between experimental data and model predictions, termed data-model conflicts.
  • The use of diverse, distributed resources widens the gap between scientists and the context of data/tools, hindering conflict diagnosis.
  • Existing methods for diagnosing these conflicts are often unsystematic and lack evidence-based support.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel methodology for systematically diagnosing data-model conflicts in computational biology.
  • To introduce a prototype system, GRENDEL, designed to aid scientists in resolving these discrepancies.
  • To demonstrate how metadata collection can bridge the contextual rift and support automated conflict diagnosis.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Decomposing the data-model evaluation process into abstract functional components.
  • Enumerating potential causes of data-model conflicts and directing metadata acquisition based on process decomposition.
  • Utilizing static and dynamic evidence from collected metadata to identify probable conflict causes.

Main Results:

  • A methodology for systematic data-model conflict diagnosis was developed and implemented.
  • A prototype knowledge-based system, GRENDEL, was built to support the methodology.
  • GRENDEL successfully assisted in diagnosing conflicts between experimental data and structural models of the 30S ribosomal subunit.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic metadata collection is crucial for bridging the contextual rift in computational biology.
  • The proposed methodology and GRENDEL system offer a more evidence-based approach to resolving data-model conflicts.
  • This work enhances the reliability and reproducibility of computational biology research by improving conflict resolution.