Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Equity in managed care for mental disorders.

M A Burnam1, J J Escarce

  • 1Drug Policy Research Center, RAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.

Health Affairs (Project Hope)
|September 25, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A randomised test of the effect of medical <i>v</i>. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the USA.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2020
Same author

Associations of Perceived Discrimination With Impaired Functioning in a Population Sample With Psychological Distress.

Psychiatry·2018
Same author

Risk of cardiovascular disease in first and second generation Mexican-Americans.

Journal of immigrant and minority health·2009
Same author

The effect of HMO penetration on physician retirement.

Health services research·2005
Same author

How managed care growth affects where physicians locate their practices.

LDI issue brief·2003
Same author

Financial incentives and drug spending in managed care.

LDI issue brief·2003

Achieving mental health care equity is complex. While insurance parity is debated, managed care shifts focus, necessitating a broader policy approach for true fairness in mental health services.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Mental Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Equity in mental health care versus general medical care is a persistent policy challenge.
  • Recent discussions have centered on insurance benefit parity for mental health services.
  • The rise of managed mental health care has altered the landscape of this debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the evolving debate on mental health care equity and insurance parity.
  • To examine the implications of managed mental health care on achieving fairness in service delivery.
  • To advocate for a broader policy perspective beyond benefit parity.

Main Methods:

  • Policy analysis of mental health care equity and insurance benefits.
  • Review of the impact of managed care models on mental health service delivery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Argumentative synthesis of fairness concerns in mental health policy.

    • Main Results:

    • The shift to managed mental health care reduces controversy surrounding cost increases related to parity.
    • Managed care diminishes the relevance of benefit parity as the primary mechanism for ensuring fairness.
    • Traditional parity arguments are insufficient for addressing fairness under managed care.

    Conclusions:

    • Benefit parity is less critical for achieving fairness in mental health services under managed care.
    • A comprehensive policy framework is essential to address fairness concerns in mental health care delivery.
    • Broader policy considerations beyond insurance benefits are required for equitable mental health services.