Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

Data Validation

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

Differential Staining Technique

Differential Staining Technique

Differential staining is an essential microbiological technique that exploits variations in cell wall structures to classify and identify microorganisms. It facilitates the distinction of bacteria, aiding in diagnostic and research applications. Two of the most widely used differential staining methods are Gram staining and acid-fast staining, both of which rely on the chemical and structural differences in bacterial cell walls.Gram Staining TechniqueGram staining differentiates bacteria by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The dental school libraries and the American Dental Association library.

Journal of dental education·2014

Same author

The heuristic and motivational value of video reinforcement.

Learning and motivation·2001

Same author

Quadrupedal locomotion in rhesus monkeys after 14 days of spaceflight.

Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology·2001

Same author

Daily activation levels in rhesus lower limb muscles.

Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology·2001

Same author

PTS performance by flight- and control-group macaques.

Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology·2001

Same author

Effects of spaceflight on rhesus quadrupedal locomotion after return to 1G.

Journal of neurophysiology·1999

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 27, 2014

Distinguishing interpretation from fact (DIFF): a computerized drill for methodology courses.

¹Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30303, USA. dwashburn@gsu.edu

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers : a Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc

|September 25, 1999

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Psychology students often struggle to differentiate facts from opinions in research. A new computer activity helps them practice this critical skill, with data showing it is effective.

Keywords:

Non-programmatic

More Related Videos

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 27, 2014

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Area of Science:

Psychology
Educational Psychology

Background:

Distinguishing factual statements from opinions is a crucial skill for psychologists.
Undergraduate students frequently demonstrate difficulty in this basic critical evaluation.
Effective research comprehension requires accurate discrimination between objective findings and subjective viewpoints.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a computerized laboratory activity designed to enhance students' ability to differentiate fact from opinion.
To provide empirical data demonstrating the efficacy of this educational intervention.

Main Methods:

Development of a novel computerized laboratory exercise.
Implementation of the activity with undergraduate psychology students.
Collection and analysis of demonstration data to assess skill improvement.

Main Results:

The computerized activity effectively trained students in discriminating between factual statements and opinions.
Demonstration data confirmed a significant improvement in students' ability to make this distinction.

Conclusions:

The developed computerized laboratory activity is an effective tool for teaching critical evaluation skills in psychology.
This exercise addresses a common deficit in undergraduate training, improving research report interpretation.