Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standard incision or no-scalpel vasectomy?

P M Alderman1, G E Morrison

  • 1Lion's Gate Hospital, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

The Journal of Family Practice
|September 25, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vasectomies: Motivations and Attitude of Physicians-as-Patients.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

Objective functional assessment of total hip arthroplasty following two common surgical approaches: the posterior and direct lateral approaches.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine·2008
Same author

Carbon fibre plates in the treatment of femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Injury·2004
Same author

A mutation in the AMPA-type glutamate receptor, glr-1, blocks olfactory associative and nonassociative learning in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Behavioral neuroscience·2001
Same author

Re: a comparative study of the no scalpel and standard incision approachesto vasectomy in 5 countries.

The Journal of urology·2000
Same author

Olfactory associative learning in Caenorhabditis elegans is impaired in lrn-1 and lrn-2 mutants.

Behavioral neuroscience·1999

No-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) offers no significant advantage over standard incision techniques for vas deferens access. Complication rates for both methods are virtually identical, suggesting unsubstantiated claims for NSV benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Techniques

Background:

  • No-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) has gained popularity, with proponents claiming reduced complications and improved patient experience.
  • Supporters allege NSV leads to fewer hematomas, infections, bleeding, shorter operative times, and less pain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the incidence of early complications between no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) and standard incision techniques.
  • To evaluate the validity of claims made regarding the benefits of NSV.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 619 consecutive vasectomies performed by a single surgeon.
  • Comparison of complication rates (infections, hematomas, bleeding) between NSV and conventional vasectomy methods.

Main Results:

  • Infection rates were similar: 0.7% for conventional vs. 0.6% for NSV.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hematoma incidence was identical at 0.3% for both techniques.
  • No incisional bleeding was observed in either group.

    • Conclusions:

    • The purported benefits of no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) are not supported by this study's findings.
    • Both standard incision and NSV methods for vas deferens access yield comparable outcomes regarding early complications.