Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Financing a future for public biological data.

L B Ellis1, D Kalumbi

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|September 28, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SIP 7: Progress in Cervical Cancer Prevention in the UK (2025 Second Edition).

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2025
Same author

Mitral Stenosis, Clinico-Physiologic Correlations, with Particular Reference to Surgical Intervention.

Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association·2011
Same author

The Use of Intravenous Veriloid in the Management of the Acute Crises of Severe Hypertensive Disease.

Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association·2011
Same author

Electrocardiographic abnormalities in severe malnutrition.

British heart journal·2010
Same author

Electrocardiography.

The New England journal of medicine·2010
Same author

Target selection for Danio rerio functional genomics.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)·2001
Same journal

Biomedical Concept Recognition with Error-aware Negative-enhanced Ranking Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

TEDLH: Domain HMMs for sensitive detection of remote homologues.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

PLNFGL: Joint Estimation of Multi-Condition Gene Networks from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

EDEL: Enhancing Dense Retrievers for Curation of Biomedical Knowledge Bases.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Public biological databases face funding uncertainty. This study explores economic models like asymmetric pricing and advertising to ensure the sustainability of these vital scientific resources.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Scientific Databases

Background:

  • Public biological databases are crucial for scientific research but face significant long-term financial support challenges.
  • A previous study indicated funding uncertainty for over two-thirds of biological databases within a 1-5 year timeframe.
  • More in-depth data are needed to understand the scope of the financial problem and identify viable solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the finances and usage statistics of selected biological database organizations.
  • To review and evaluate various economic models for ensuring the long-term sustainability of these databases.

Main Methods:

  • In-depth financial and usage analysis of six biological database organizations.
  • Review of economic models including asymmetric pricing, advertising, and microcommerce.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Estimation of overall financial needs for the biological database infrastructure.
  • Main Results:

    • Administrative overhead for studied organizations is relatively low, with personnel and computer costs comprising 77% of expenses.
    • Asymmetric pricing is emerging as a popular model for industrial support, with at least five databases adopting it.
    • Estimated annual support needed for 400 biological databases is at least $20 million, highlighting a substantial funding gap.

    Conclusions:

    • Biological databases require significant financial support, estimated at a minimum of $20 million annually.
    • Models such as asymmetric pricing, advertising, and microcommerce show promise for generating revenue.
    • Addressing the financial sustainability of biological databases is critical to prevent catastrophic loss of valuable scientific resources.