Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion transparency: making models of motion perception transparent.

Snowden1, Verstraten

  • 1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK CF1 3YG.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|September 28, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Visual perception integrates local motion signals to interpret complex scenes, like transparently moving surfaces. Two models, filter selection and Bayesian inference, are compared to understand this visual motion processing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2000
Same author

Intramolecular carbolithiation reactions for the preparation of Azabicyclo

The Journal of organic chemistry·2000
Same author

Adsorption of Lead Ions onto N -Isopropylacrylamide and Acrylic Acid Copolymer Microgels

Journal of colloid and interface science·1997
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Visual neuroscience
  • Computational vision
  • Perception psychology

Background:

  • The visual system processes abundant motion information daily.
  • Early visual motion processing (local motion detection) is well understood.
  • Current research focuses on higher-level motion integration for object perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate computational models of motion transparency.
  • To compare 'filter selection' and Bayesian inference approaches.
  • To relate model predictions to human visual behavior and neural substrates.

Main Methods:

  • Computational modeling of visual motion perception.
  • Psychophysical experiments measuring human visual behavior.
  • Comparison of model predictions with experimental data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Analysis of 'filter selection' model predictions.
  • Analysis of Bayesian inference model predictions.
  • Comparison of model performance against human perception and neural data.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding motion transparency requires advanced motion integration.
  • Bayesian inference offers a promising framework for explaining complex motion perception.
  • Further research can refine models using combined computational, psychophysical, and neurophysiological data.