Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Long-latency auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implants].

J J Mata1, J M Jiménez, J Pérez

  • 1Centro Audiológico S. L., Sevilla, 41011, España. centaudiologico@cim.es

Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola
|September 30, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spinal gunshot wounds: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia·2024
Same author

Spinal gunshot wounds: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia·2023
Same author

Dosage of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies: a cardinal open question.

Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico·2021
Same author

BCN Checkpoint: same-day confirmation of reactive HIV rapid test with Point Of Care HIV-RNA accelerates linkage to care and reduces anxiety.

HIV medicine·2018
Same author

[Prevalence of human papillomavirus in Spanish women from a population screening program].

Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia·2017
Same author

ZEB1 and TCF4 reciprocally modulate their transcriptional activities to regulate Wnt target gene expression.

Oncogene·2015
Same journal

Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO) and factors modifying laryngeal function in the population of Polish athletes.

Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola·2026
Same journal

Carolyn's Window as a targeted alternative to Draf IIa in isolated anterior frontal recess obstruction.

Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola·2026
Same journal

Persistent Shoulder Dysfunction After Spinal Accessory Nerve-Preserving Neck Dissection: A Prospective Functional and Neurophysiologic Study.

Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola·2026
Same journal

Transoral Laser Microsurgery for Early Glottic Carcinoma: Laryngeal Preservation and Long-term Oncological Outcomes in 161 Patients.

Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola·2026
Same journal

A Case of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis Masquerading as Benign Pediatric Head and Neck Lesions: A Diagnostic Pitfall.

Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola·2026
Same journal

Cochlear Implantation in a Child with Biallelic RDX Variant (DFNB24): Long-Term Auditory Outcome.

Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola·2026
See all related articles

Cochlear implants help assess central cognitive processes. Prelingual patients showed longer P300 wave latencies compared to postlingual patients, indicating differences in signal processing.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cochlear implants are crucial for hearing restoration.
  • Evaluating central auditory processing is essential for rehabilitation outcomes.
  • Cortical evoked potentials offer objective measures of neural activity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cortical evoked potentials, specifically the P300 wave, in cochlear implant recipients.
  • To compare P300 latency in relation to prelingual versus postlingual deafness.
  • To assess the impact of rehabilitation stage and stimulus intensity on auditory processing.

Main Methods:

  • Cortical evoked potentials, focusing on the P300 wave, were recorded in 8 adult cochlear implant users.
  • Two tones (frequent 1000 Hz, infrequent 2000 Hz) were presented at 70 and 80 dB HL.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis compared latency values based on prelingual/postlingual status, rehabilitation stage, and stimulus intensity.

    • Main Results:

    • Absolute P300 latencies did not show significant differences across groups.
    • Latency relative to reaction time was significantly longer in prelingual patients compared to postlingual patients (p < 0.05).
    • Central cognitive processes were deemed normal based on P300 latency assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Objective assessment of P300 latency confirms normal central cognitive processing in cochlear implant patients.
    • Significant differences in central signal processing exist between prelingual and postlingual cochlear implant recipients.
    • Findings highlight the importance of considering the timing of deafness in auditory rehabilitation strategies.