Related Experiment Videos
Assessment of plate use for mandibular reconstruction: has changing technology made a difference?
1Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa 33606, USA.
Summary
This study reviewed mandibular reconstruction plating over 22 years. While plate fractures decreased, plate exposure rates remained unchanged, with recurrent disease significantly impacting complications.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Surgical Reconstruction
Background:
- Mandibular defects require reconstruction using alloplastic materials.
- Plate-related complications are a concern in mandibular reconstruction.
- Various plating technologies have been developed over time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of different plating technologies on complications in mandibular reconstruction.
- To identify factors influencing plate-related complications, such as plate exposure, fracture, and removal.
- To analyze outcomes over a 22-year period.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of mandibular reconstructions using alloplastic materials over 22 years.
- Comparison of outcomes associated with miniplates, reconstruction plates, titanium hollow screw plates, and locking reconstruction plates.
- Analysis of complication incidence, including plate exposure, fracture, and removal.
Main Results:
- The incidence of plate fractures has decreased with newer plating technologies.
- There was no significant change in the rate of plate exposure across different plating types.
- Recurrent disease was identified as a significant factor contributing to plate-related complications.
Conclusions:
- Advancements in plating technology have reduced plate fractures but not plate exposure rates.
- Recurrent disease is a critical factor to consider in preventing plate-related complications.
- Further research may focus on strategies to mitigate exposure and the impact of recurrent disease.