Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations.

M Wraga1, S H Creem, D R Proffitt

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. mjwraga@wjh.harvard.edu

Acta Psychologica
|October 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Mental transformations of objects are harder than viewer rotations due to difficulties imagining object frames. Viewer frame rotations are cohesive and unaffected by other reference frames.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceiving geographical slant.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

An fMRI study of imagined self-rotation.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2002
Same author

Seeing mountains in mole hills: geographical-slant perception.

Psychological science·2001
Same author

Two memories for geographical slant: separation and interdependence of action and awareness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Imagining physically impossible self-rotations: geometry is more important than gravity.

Cognition·2001
Same author

Imagining rotation by endogenous versus exogenous forces: distinct neural mechanisms.

Neuroreport·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human visual system

Background:

  • The human visual system uses multiple frames of reference for spatial representation and mental transformations.
  • Performance disparities exist in mental transformations, with imagined object rotations being more challenging than viewer rotations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the discrepancy between imagined object and viewer rotations by examining associated reference frames.
  • To understand how different reference frames influence the difficulty of mental transformations.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of mental rotation, motor imagery, and related research domains.
  • Analysis of how intrinsic, environmental, and viewer-relative frames of reference impact mental transformations.
Keywords:
Non-programmatic

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Difficulties in imagining object rotations stem from challenges in cohesive rotation of the object's intrinsic frame.
  • Object rotation judgments rely heavily on supplementary information from other frames, like the environmental frame.
  • Imagined viewer rotations are cohesive and less affected by other reference frames.

Conclusions:

  • The difference in difficulty between object and viewer mental rotations is attributed to the cohesive nature of viewer-relative frame transformations.
  • Understanding reference frames is crucial for explaining variations in mental transformation capabilities.