Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a decision analysis.

A P Vasen1, K M Kuntz, B P Simmons

  • 1Seaview Orthopaedic and Medical Associates, Neptune, NJ, USA.

The Journal of Hand Surgery
|October 6, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery costs are similar to open surgery, but can be higher if complications arise or return-to-work is delayed. Faster recovery for non-workers' compensation patients favors the endoscopic approach.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography use for percutaneous coronary intervention procedures.

European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes·2026
Same author

Consequences of patient denial at first exemption request for cardiac transplantation.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2025
Same author

Effectiveness of remote exercise programs in reducing pain for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of randomized trials.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage open·2022
Same author

Does gabapentin provide benefit for patients with knee OA? A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2022
Same author

Treatment of the syndrome of knee pain and meniscal tear in middle-aged and older persons: A narrative review.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage open·2022
Same author

Mechanical symptoms and meniscal tear: a reappraisal.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2021

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Health Economics
  • Decision Analysis

Background:

  • Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) treatment aims to reduce patient morbidity and speed return to work.
  • Endoscopic techniques were developed to potentially improve outcomes compared to traditional open surgery.
  • Understanding the cost-effectiveness of different surgical approaches is crucial for healthcare providers and patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the total societal costs of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release surgery.
  • To identify key parameters influencing the cost-effectiveness of each surgical technique.
  • To analyze the economic implications for different patient populations, including workers' compensation recipients.

Main Methods:

  • Decision analysis modeling was employed to compare the total costs of open and endoscopic CTS surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Societal perspective was adopted, incorporating direct medical costs, complication costs, and lost wages.
  • Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of varying key parameters on cost outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Base case analysis indicated similar total costs for both endoscopic and open techniques.
    • Endoscopic surgery becomes more costly if complication rates exceed 6.2% or return-to-work is delayed.
    • Cost-effectiveness is highly sensitive to the difference in return-to-work time, particularly for workers' compensation patients.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice between endoscopic and open carpal tunnel surgery has nuanced cost implications.
    • Faster return-to-work times significantly favor the endoscopic approach, especially for non-injured workers.
    • Further research is needed for precise data on risks and costs associated with CTS surgical treatments.