Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Waiving death row appeals: whose right is it anyway?

K J Weiss1

  • 1Delaware Valley Research Associates, Inc, USA. kweiss@hslc.org

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|October 6, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Death row inmates can waive appeals, but legal standards exist to ensure competence and prevent executing the insane. Competency tests and case law, like the Gary Heidnik case, inform these complex decisions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Needs assessment to improve neonatal intensive care in Mexico.

Paediatrics and international child health·2015
Same author

A duty to the parents of an allegedly abused child? Althaus v. Cohen.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2001
Same author

Transitioning individuals with mental retardation and developmental disability: The other sister.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2000
Same author

Education, special needs, and medical exclusions: a good "IDEA"?

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2000
Same author

Psychiatric testimony and the "reasonable person" standard.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2000
Same author

Anxiety, depression, and diseases of the lower extremities.

Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery·1999

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Legal Psychology
  • Criminal Justice

Background:

  • Death row prisoners may choose to forgo legal appeals, accelerating their execution.
  • Reasons for waiving appeals include mental health issues, prison conditions, and personal beliefs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline legal tests for assessing a death row inmate's competence to waive appeals.
  • To examine the legal and ethical considerations surrounding such waivers.
  • To propose a classification system for inmates requesting to waive appeals.

Main Methods:

  • Review of legal standards and case law regarding competency to waive appeals.
  • Analysis of the Gary Heidnik case as an illustrative example.
  • Discussion of psychiatric, legal, and judicial perspectives on waiver.

Main Results:

  • Jurisdictions have varying restrictions on appeal waivers due to the gravity of capital punishment.
  • Inmates lacking competence may have a "next friend" appointed, and the Constitution prohibits executing the "insane."
  • The Heidnik case highlights complex issues for professionals involved in waiver decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Competency to waive appeals is a critical legal and ethical issue in capital cases.
  • A proposed classification system aims to standardize the evaluation of inmates seeking to waive appeals.
  • Balancing a prisoner's autonomy with the state's duty to ensure fairness is paramount.

Related Experiment Videos