Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dry Friction01:30

Dry Friction

Dry friction occurs between two solid surfaces in contact as they attempt to move relative to one another. In daily life, dry friction is encountered in various forms, such as when walking on the ground, sliding an object across a table, or rubbing hands together. Despite its ubiquity, the underlying mechanisms behind dry friction are not readily visible.
To illustrate this concept, imagine a wooden crate resting on a rough, non-uniform horizontal surface. When an external force is applied to...
Bearings: Problem Solving01:24

Bearings: Problem Solving

Understanding the calculations and concepts related to double-collar bearings is essential for engineers and designers to optimize the performance of these components in various applications. By analyzing the bearing under different conditions, one can ensure that it can withstand the forces and moments experienced during operation. This knowledge enables better decision-making when designing and selecting bearings for specific purposes and configurations. Consider a double-collar bearing with...
Rolling Resistance01:21

Rolling Resistance

When a solid cylinder rolls steadily on a rigid surface, the normal force applied by the surface on the cylinder is perpendicular to the tangent at the contact point. However, since no materials are entirely rigid, the surface's reaction to the cylinder involves a range of normal pressures.
For instance, imagine a hard cylinder rolling on a comparatively soft surface. The cylinder's weight compresses the surface beneath it. As the cylinder moves, the material in front of it slows down due to...
Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving01:17

Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving

Rolling resistance, also known as rolling friction, is the force that resists the motion of a rolling object, such as a wheel, tire, or ball, when it moves over a surface. It is caused by the deformation of the object and the surface in contact with each other, as well as other factors like internal friction, hysteresis, and energy losses within the materials. Rolling resistance opposes the object's motion, requiring additional energy to overcome it and maintain movement. In practical...
Mohr's Circle for Moments of Inertia: Problem Solving01:14

Mohr's Circle for Moments of Inertia: Problem Solving

Mohr's circle is a graphical method for determining an area's principal moments by plotting the moments and product of inertia on a rectangular coordinate system. This circle can also be used to calculate the orientation of the principal axes.
Consider a rectangular beam. The moments of inertia of the beam about the x and y axis are 2.5(107) mm4 and 7.5(107) mm4, respectively. The product of inertia is 1.5(107) mm4. Determine the principal moments of inertia and the orientation of the major and...
Logarithmic Differentiation01:28

Logarithmic Differentiation

When a car’s weight and driving forces act on a tire, they impose an external load on the rubber material. This load is resisted internally by forces distributed throughout the tire structure, which are defined as stress. The resulting deformation of the rubber due to this stress is quantified as strain. The relationship between stress and strain governs how the tire deforms under load and is central to understanding its mechanical response during operation.Rubber exhibits a nonlinear...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.

Wisconsin law review·2005
Same author

General Electric Co. v. Joiner: lighting up the post-Daubert landscape?

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1998
Same author

The efficacy of involuntary outpatient treatment in Massachusetts.

Administration and policy in mental health·1998
Same author

A national survey of "consumer empowerment" at the state level.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·1998
Same author

A competency-based approach to court-ordered outpatient treatment.

New directions for mental health services·1997
Same author

Kansas v. Hendricks.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1997

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael.

A J Grudzinskas1

  • 1University of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS), Department of Psychiatry, Worcester, MA 01655, USA. al.grudzinskas@umassmed.edu

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|October 6, 1999
PubMed
Summary

The Supreme Court ruled that all expert testimony, regardless of its basis, must meet the same relevance and reliability standards. This decision impacts how expert opinions are evaluated in products liability cases.

Area of Science:

  • Product Liability Law
  • Evidence Law
  • Supreme Court Rulings

Background:

  • The U.S. Supreme Court reviewed a products liability case involving Kumho Tire.
  • An appellate court had overturned a district court's exclusion of expert testimony regarding tire failure.
  • The case stemmed from an accident causing personal injury and a fatality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the Supreme Court's decision in the Kumho Tire products liability case.
  • To clarify the standards for admitting expert testimony in legal proceedings.
  • To examine the implications of the ruling on future admissibility of expert opinions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling and legal reasoning.
  • Review of the appellate court's decision and the district court's exclusion of testimony.

More Related Videos

Determination of the Friction Coefficients of Icy Pavements Under Different Amounts of Snowfall
12:21

Determination of the Friction Coefficients of Icy Pavements Under Different Amounts of Snowfall

Published on: January 6, 2023

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
09:53

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
14:55

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street

Published on: January 20, 2023

Determination of the Friction Coefficients of Icy Pavements Under Different Amounts of Snowfall
12:21

Determination of the Friction Coefficients of Icy Pavements Under Different Amounts of Snowfall

Published on: January 6, 2023

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
09:53

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

  • Examination of the legal precedent and its impact on evidence standards.
  • Main Results:

    • The Supreme Court established a uniform standard for the admissibility of expert testimony.
    • Expert testimony, whether derived from studies or experience, must be relevant and reliable.
    • The ruling resolved conflicting interpretations among circuit courts regarding expert evidence.

    Conclusions:

    • The decision standardizes the scrutiny applied to all expert testimony.
    • This ruling will influence the admissibility of expert witness testimony in future products liability and other legal cases.
    • Ensuring reliability and relevance is now a consistent requirement for expert evidence.