Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Needleless intravenous systems: A review.

P L Russo1, G A Harrington, D W Spelman

  • 1Infection Control Unit, Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

American Journal of Infection Control
|October 8, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of non-ventilator healthcare-associated pneumonia on mortality and additional length of stay in adults admitted to an acute care hospital: a systematic review.

The Journal of hospital infection·2026
Same author

Cleaning time and motion: an observational study on the time required to clean shared medical equipment in hospitals effectively.

The Journal of hospital infection·2024
Same author

Comparison of an algorithm, and coding data, with traditional surveillance to identify surgical site infections in Australia: a retrospective multi-centred cohort study.

The Journal of hospital infection·2024
Same author

How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A scoping review.

The Journal of hospital infection·2024
Same author

Not the entire picture: a pragmatic review on CAUTI.

The Journal of hospital infection·2023
Same author

Correction: Burden of five healthcare associated infections in Australia.

Antimicrobial resistance and infection control·2022
Same journal

Optimizing Hospital Admission Screening for Candidozyma auris: Comparative Cost-Impact of Workflow Strategies.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Cost-Effectiveness of a Practical Approach to Prevent Respiratory Infection Outbreaks in Long-Term Care Settings: The CARES Strategy.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Advancing the science of hydrogen peroxide disinfection.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Enterprise Risk Management-Based Framework for Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Gynecologic Surgery: A Multidisciplinary Implementation Study.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Occupational Mpox in Personal Protective Equipment-Compliant Registered Nurse Reinforces Importance of CDC 21-Day Self-Monitoring After Patient Care.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same journal

Simulation-based outbreak training and large language models in infection prevention and control education.

American journal of infection control·2026
See all related articles

Needleless intravenous devices may reduce needlestick injuries, but evidence suggests these prevented injuries pose little risk. Emerging data links these devices to bacteremia, necessitating ongoing review of their risks and benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare technology assessment
  • Infection control
  • Patient safety

Background:

  • Needleless intravenous (IV) devices are widely adopted globally.
  • A primary driver for adoption is the potential reduction in needlestick injuries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the benefits and risks associated with needleless IV systems.
  • To critically evaluate the evidence regarding their impact on healthcare worker safety and patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of early and recent reports on needleless IV device implementation.
  • Analysis of data on needlestick injury rates and bacteremia associations.
  • Examination of device use in various healthcare settings, from home care to intensive care units.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • While some studies show reduced needlestick injuries with needleless IV devices, causality is not always clear.
  • Evidence indicates that needlestick accidents prevented by these devices pose minimal health risks to healthcare workers.
  • Increasing reports associate the use of needleless IV devices with bloodstream infections (bacteremias).

Conclusions:

  • The benefits of needleless IV devices, particularly regarding needlestick injury reduction, require careful evaluation.
  • The association with bacteremias highlights potential patient safety risks.
  • Continuous critical review of the benefits, risks, and costs of needleless IV devices is essential.