Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cochlear gene transfer: round window versus cochleostomy inoculation.

T Stöver1, M Yagi, Y Raphael

  • 1Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Michigan Medical School, MSRB 3, Rm. 9303, 1150 W. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0648, USA.

Hearing Research
|October 8, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Research in university ENT departments-results of a Germany-wide survey on motivation, barriers, and structural conditions].

HNO·2026
Same author

Securing our HIV response: The PEPFAR crisis in South Africa.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2025
Same author

Classification of Follow-up Rehabilitation ("AHB") in the Context of Postoperative Cochlear Implant (CI) Care.

Laryngo- rhino- otologie·2025
Same author

Risk factors in patients treated with surgical drainage for rhinogenic intracranial complications: a nationwide study.

Rhinology·2025
Same author

The German cochlear implant registry: one year experience and first results on demographic data.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2024
Same author

Urgent appeal to allow all professional nurses and midwives to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in South Africa.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2023
Same journal

MERGE: Misophonia and emotion regulation in a guided experience sampling study.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Repopulating microglia recapitulate developmental characteristics during a period of auditory circuit recovery.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Deficits in tail-lift and air-righting reflexes in rats after ototoxicity associate with loss of vestibular type I hair cells.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Slc16a5 (MCT6) knockout induces sex-dependent changes in auditory function, hair cell viability and cochlear transcriptomic programs in the mouse.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Anatomical feasibility and experimental evaluation of sensor coupling sites for fully implantable active middle ear implants.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Polygenic risk score analysis of noise-induced hearing loss: An integrated cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

Cochlear gene transfer is more effective via cochleostomy than the round window membrane, with no significant impact on hearing. Deafened animals showed better gene transfer results.

Area of Science:

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Gene Therapy
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cochlear gene transfer is crucial for treating hearing loss.
  • Two primary inoculation methods are round window membrane and cochleostomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of cochlear gene transfer via round window membrane versus cochleostomy.
  • To assess the impact of these methods on auditory function.

Main Methods:

  • Adenovirus carrying lacZ reporter gene inoculated in guinea pigs via both methods.
  • Cochlear tissue stained with X-gal; gene transfer assessed by scoring.
  • Auditory brainstem response (ABR) measured to evaluate hearing thresholds.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Cochleostomy resulted in superior gene distribution and intensity compared to the round window membrane.
  • Neither inoculation method significantly affected click-ABR thresholds at 5 days post-injection.
  • Gene transfer was more efficient in deafened animals than in normal-hearing animals.

    • Conclusions:

    • Cochleostomy is a more effective route for cochlear gene transfer.
    • Gene transfer via these methods does not appear to impair auditory function in the short term.
    • Deafened cochleae may be more receptive to gene transfer.