Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Nursing diagnosis. Keys for its development].

J A Guirao i Goris1, A Cuesta Zambrana, A Benavent Garcés

  • 1Universidad de Valencia.

Revista De Enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain)
|October 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary

The 1990 NANDA taxonomy requires refinement. Improving nursing diagnostic labels is crucial for accurate patient assessment and evidence-based practice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[The tobacco habit in nursing. A study conducted in the community of Valencia].

Revista de enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain)·1990
Same author

[Nursing personnel needs in the community of Valencia].

Revista de enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain)·1987
Same author

[Ethics and pediatric nursing].

Revista de enfermeria (Barcelona, Spain)·1985
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Medical Diagnostics

Context:

  • Critique of the 1990 North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) taxonomy.
  • Analysis presented at the First International Symposium on Nursing Diagnostics in Barcelona.

Purpose:

  • To evaluate the clarity and utility of existing nursing diagnostic labels.
  • To identify areas for improvement in nursing diagnostic terminology and application.

Summary:

  • Findings indicate several NANDA diagnostic labels are imprecise, vague, or difficult to verify objectively.
  • Some labels necessitate collaboration with other professionals, limiting independent nursing action.
  • Recommendations include validating existing labels, developing new ones, and refining diagnostic criteria.

Impact:

  • Enhancing the precision and objectivity of nursing diagnoses.
  • Strengthening the scientific basis of nursing practice and autonomous decision-making.
  • Improving the development of diagnostic tests for appraisal and detection.

Related Experiment Videos