Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy.

T M Khalili1, J R Hiatt, A Savar

  • 1Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.

The American Surgeon
|October 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence-based multidisciplinary model of care for newborn screening in spinal muscular atrophy.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

Response to Rattanapitoon et al., "Serum 7αC4 as a pragmatic diagnostic tool for bile acid malabsorption in Mexico: Implications and future directions".

Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico (English)·2025
Same author

The Epidemiology of Healthcare-Acquired Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Among Hospitalised Paediatric Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Influenza and other respiratory viruses·2025
Same author

Psychometric validation of comprehensive coordination scale to assess the advanced coordination ability in people with stroke.

European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2025
Same author

Real-world experience with the diagnosis of bile acid malabsorption (BAM) using serum 7-alpha-C4 and 48-hour stool bile acids.

Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico (English)·2025
Same author

Limit of detection of <i>Salmonella</i> ser. Enteritidis using culture-based versus culture-independent diagnostic approaches.

Microbiology spectrum·2024
Same journal

What the Salary Rankings Miss About Pediatric Surgery: Readiness, Not Compensation.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Contrast Without Clarity: The Questionable Role of Oral Contrast in Detecting Missed Hollow Viscus Injury.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Learning Surgery's Moral Questions: Mentorship, Reflection, and Professional Formation.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Complete Response of Merkel Cell Carcinoma to Immunotherapy and Single-Fraction Radiotherapy Following Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and Review of Immune Mechanism.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction in Non-Cardiac Operations: A National Analysis.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of Completion Cholecystectomy: Association With Patient Comorbidity in a National Database.

The American surgeon·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis does not increase the risk of intra-abdominal abscess formation. This study compared laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, finding similar abscess rates between the two procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Procedures
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Infectious Disease Complications

Background:

  • Perforated appendicitis is a common surgical emergency.
  • Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly used for appendectomies.
  • Concerns exist regarding increased intra-abdominal abscess risk with laparoscopy for perforated appendicitis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the incidence of intra-abdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.
  • To evaluate operative time and length of stay for both procedures in perforated appendicitis cases.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 690 appendectomy cases (January 1994 - June 1997).
  • Classification of appendicitis as acute, gangrenous, or perforated based on intraoperative findings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of procedures into open, laparoscopic converted to open, or laparoscopic.

    • Main Results:

    • A total of 199 patients had perforated appendicitis.
    • Intra-abdominal abscesses occurred in 1.7% of open, 3.7% of converted, and 1% of laparoscopic appendectomies for perforated appendicitis.
    • No significant difference in abscess rates was observed between open, converted, and laparoscopic approaches for perforated appendicitis.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis is a safe alternative to open appendectomy.
    • The procedure is not associated with a higher risk of intra-abdominal abscess formation.
    • Further research may explore long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.