Related Experiment Videos
Hume on the nonhuman animal.
1Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|October 12, 1999
Summary
David Hume explored human and animal minds, finding similarities in cognitive and emotional capacities. His work suggests differences in animal reason and moral agency are of degree, not kind, paving the way for naturalistic explanations.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy of Mind
- Comparative Cognition
- History of Philosophy
Background:
- Examines David Hume's philosophical contributions to understanding animal minds.
- Traces historical debates on animal cognition and moral standing from ancient to early modern philosophy.
- Highlights Hume's analogical method and favorable conclusions regarding animal abilities.
Discussion:
- Hume's focus on cognitive and emotional lives of animals, with implications for moral standing.
- Analysis of similarities and dissimilarities between human and nonhuman animal minds.
- Hume's perspective on moral qualities in animal actions, such as other-regarding instincts.
Key Insights:
- Hume posits differences in animal reason and moral agency are primarily matters of degree, not kind.
- While not attributing moral sense, Hume identifies moral qualities in animal behavior.
- Advocates for a naturalistic approach, using identical methods to study both human and nonhuman minds.
Outlook:
- Hume's work provides a foundation for contemporary comparative psychology and ethics.
- Encourages further investigation into the psychological and epistemological capacities of animals.
- Suggests a unified framework for understanding consciousness across species.