Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hume on suicide.

R G Frey1

  • 1Philosophy Department, Bowling Green State University, OH 43403, USA.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|October 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

David Hume's essay remains central to the morality of suicide debate. It argues for autonomous decisions to end life, moving beyond theological condemnation towards a secular ethical framework.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pain, vivisection, and the value of life.

Journal of medical ethics·2005
Same author

Moral community and animal research in medicine.

Ethics & behavior·1997
Same author

Medicine, animal experimentation, and the moral problem of unfortunate humans.

Social philosophy & policy·1996
Same author

Moral standing, the value of lives, and speciesism.

Between the species : a journal of ethics·1988
Same author

[Light reflexes of the fundus oculi. Paper on an atlas which appeared under this title in Russian by A.M. Vodovozov].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·1983
Same author

Vivisection, morals and medicine.

Journal of medical ethics·1983
Same journal

Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

"It's Shaking Your Entire Construction as a Human Being": A Qualitative Analysis on Epistemic Injustice and Medical Gaslighting Consequences in Patients Living with Chronic Pain.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy
  • Ethics
  • History of Ideas

Background:

  • David Hume's 18th-century essay on suicide is a foundational text in contemporary ethical discussions.
  • The essay challenges theological prohibitions against suicide, advocating for a non-theologically based ethical approach.
  • It highlights the historical shift towards secular ethics in the Enlightenment period.

Discussion:

  • Hume's work establishes the basis for debating the morality of suicide.
  • It frames the discussion around the concept of autonomous decision-making in response to life conditions.
  • The essay questions blanket condemnations of suicide, paving the way for nuanced ethical consideration.

Key Insights:

  • The central debate revolves around whether specific life circumstances can justify autonomous decisions to end one's life.
Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaEighteenth CenturyPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hume's argument necessitates a departure from absolute theological condemnation of suicide.
  • Voluntariness and personal autonomy are presented as key factors in assessing the morality of suicide.

    • Outlook:

    • Hume's essay provides a modern framework for discussing the ethics of suicide.
    • Continued engagement with Hume's arguments is crucial for contemporary philosophical and ethical discourse.
    • The essay's emphasis on autonomy and life conditions remains relevant for current debates on end-of-life choices.