Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR SEROTONIN AND HISTAMINE ABNORMALITIES.

A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
Same author

The interrelationship of complement-activation fragments and angiogenesis-related factors in early pregnancy and their association with pre-eclampsia.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2010
Same author

Crossbridge and backbone structure of invertebrate thick filaments.

Biophysical journal·2009
Same author

Effect of breastfeeding on cognitive development of infants born small for gestational age.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2002
Same author

Demystifying central review boards: current options and future directions.

IRB·2002
Same author

No evidence for lipid peroxidation in severe preeclampsia.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2001
Same journal

WHO Issues Guidelines for Treating Ebola and Marburg Viruses.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

FDA Approves Additional Naloxone Nasal Spray for Opioid Overdose.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

HIV May Hide in More Cells Than Previously Thought-Here's What That Could Mean for a Cure.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

US Dietary Supplement Use Increasing, Especially in Older Adults.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Heat Stress From Climate Change Surges Globally.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Strength Training Linked With Lower Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women.

JAMA·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Resolving discrepancies between a meta-analysis and a subsequent large controlled trial.

R DerSimonian1, R J Levine

  • 1Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Development, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, USA. DerSimonian@nih.gov

JAMA
|October 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Calcium supplementation may prevent preeclampsia in healthy high-risk women, but not in low-risk populations. Further research is needed to confirm efficacy in high-risk groups. Preeclampsia prevention remains an area for study.

More Related Videos

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Nutritional Science
  • Clinical Epidemiology

Background:

  • A meta-analysis indicated calcium supplementation effectively prevents preeclampsia.
  • The NIH Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) trial found no risk reduction in healthy nulliparous women.
  • Discrepancies between studies necessitate further investigation into calcium's role in preeclampsia prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reconcile conflicting findings between a meta-analysis and the CPEP trial.
  • To evaluate the impact of effect heterogeneity on study discrepancies.
  • To assess the efficacy of calcium supplementation for preeclampsia prevention.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of English-language articles published before July 10, 1997.
  • Inclusion of trials reporting data on preeclampsia and calcium supplementation.
  • Analysis of 14 trials, stratifying by placebo-controlled groups and risk populations (high-risk vs. low-risk).

Main Results:

  • Substantial heterogeneity was observed across trials (P = .001).
  • In placebo-controlled trials with low-risk populations, calcium showed no significant benefit (RR, 0.79; P = .30), aligning with CPEP trial results.
  • In healthy high-risk populations, calcium suggested a strong benefit (RR, 0.19; P = .001), though results were equivocal due to small sample size (n=225) and inconsistent data.

Conclusions:

  • Calcium supplementation's efficacy for preeclampsia prevention in healthy high-risk populations requires further investigation.
  • A single summary measure is insufficient for meta-analyses with significant heterogeneity.
  • Identifying covariates to reduce heterogeneity is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.