Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variability in spine loading model performance.

W S Marras1, K P Granta, K G Davis

  • 1Biodynamics Laboratory, The Ohio State University, 1971 Neil Ave, Columbus 43210, USA. wsm@osuergo.eng.ohio-state.edu

Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
|October 16, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Job Rotation: Biomechanical Risk, Body Discomfort, and Psychosocial Demands.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Assessment of the occupational exposures within homes for home healthcare workers in the United Kingdom.

Human factors in healthcare·2025
Same author

An Ergonomic Comparison of Data Entry Work Using a Keyboard vs. Touch Screen Input Device While Standing and Sitting.

Journal of ergonomics·2025
Same author

An EMG-driven biomechanical model of the canine cervical spine.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2017
Same author

MRI cross sectional atlas of normal canine cervical musculoskeletal structure.

Research in veterinary science·2016
Same author

A quantitative description of typing biomechanics.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2013
Same journal

Biomechanical study of Tibial plateau fractures using 3D printing and digital design: A finite element analysis.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical effects of Kinesio versus Mulligan ankle taping on balance and ankle function in chronic STROKE: A randomized controlled trial.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Interlimb differences in knee joint loading and stress distribution following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during stair descent.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Exploring real-world lumbar posture behaviour. A whole day comparison of individuals with low back pain and healthy controls.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Motor differences in jumping among children with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Reduced lower extremity strength, altered muscle activation, and unchanged kinetics during single-leg squatting in males with patellofemoral pain versus pain-free males: A cross-sectional analysis.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
See all related articles

Variability in EMG-assisted spine loading models is primarily due to subject differences and experience, not task variations. Accurate models require realistic calibration of trunk muscle length and force capacity for reliable biomechanical assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Occupational Health
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Biomechanical assessments of lifting tasks involve inherent variability.
  • This variability can stem from individual differences in motion (kinematics) or the performance of biomechanical models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the sources of variability in an EMG-assisted spine loading model.
  • To determine factors influencing the accuracy and reliability of biomechanical risk assessments during lifting.

Main Methods:

  • In vivo measurements of trunk dynamics, lifting moments, and muscle activity were collected.
  • Twelve material handlers (experienced and inexperienced) performed varied lifting tasks, replicated across two days.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Variability was predominantly linked to subject characteristics and experience levels.
  • Task asymmetry and load weight had minor impacts on variability.
  • Experienced workers exhibited greater back range of motion, affecting model calibration.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate EMG-assisted models necessitate realistic calibration of trunk muscle length-force relationships.
  • Proper model calibration accounts for variations attributed to the neuromuscular control system, not model randomness.