Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interventional MR: vascular applications.

H F Smits1, C Bos, R van der Weide

  • 1Department of Radiology, University Hospital Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.

European Radiology
|October 20, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to improve support for people with (complex) multiple-problems through social prescribing in a vulnerable neighborhood; professionals', experts-by-experience' and clients' perspectives.

BMC primary care·2025
Same author

Rechallenge of ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced melanoma patients after previous ipilimumab-based therapy.

British journal of cancer·2025
Same author

Implement social prescribing successfully towards embedding: what works, for whom and in which context? A rapid realist review.

BMC public health·2024
Same author

Update about Oralair® as a treatment for grass pollen allergic rhinitis.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2022
Same author

Assessment of 3D motion modeling performance for dose accumulation mapping on the MR-linac by simultaneous multislice MRI.

Physics in medicine and biology·2019
Same author

Characterization of imaging latency for real-time MRI-guided radiotherapy.

Physics in medicine and biology·2018
Same journal

Body composition's effect on the bone-vascular axis of osteoporosis discovered in AI-based CT analysis of COPD patients.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: pelvic floor imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

STIR or T2-Dixon? A false dilemma in musculoskeletal MRI.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: uterine cancers-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive quantification for more reproducible amyloid PET interpretation.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

APEX-NET: automated pancreatic evaluation network using early non-contrast CT.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

This study reviews three methods for visualizing MR-guided medical devices: active tracking, local field inhomogeneity, and passive susceptibility tracking. Each technique

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Interventional Radiology
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background:

  • Accurate visualization of guidewires and catheters during Magnetic Resonance (MR) procedures is crucial for interventional radiology.
  • Existing visualization methods face challenges in real-time tracking and precision.
  • Development of MR-dedicated devices and tracking technologies is an active area of research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of three primary MR visualization strategies for medical devices.
  • To discuss advancements in MR-dedicated guidewires, catheters, and associated imaging techniques.
  • To review post-processing tools and display capabilities for MR tracking systems.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of active tracking, locally induced field inhomogeneity, and passive susceptibility-based tracking techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of current MR-dedicated guidewire and catheter designs.
  • Examination of scan protocols, post-processing algorithms, and visualization interfaces for MR tracking.

    • Main Results:

    • Each visualization strategy presents unique benefits and limitations regarding accuracy, cost, and complexity.
    • Active tracking offers high precision but can be complex; field inhomogeneity is simpler but may have lower resolution.
    • Passive susceptibility tracking provides a balance but relies on material properties.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of MR tracking technique depends on the specific clinical application and required precision.
    • Continued development in device design and imaging technology is enhancing the feasibility of MR-guided interventions.
    • MR tracking significantly improves the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive procedures.