Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Deep Dermal Injection As a Model of Candida albicans Skin Infection for Histological Analyses
Published on: June 13, 2018
Fusidic acid in skin and soft tissue infections
1Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, Prahan, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. d.spelman@alfred.org.au
Abstract:
Skin and soft skin tissue infections are usually caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. In vitro data show good activity of fusidic acid against staphylococci but the minimal inhibitory concentrations for streptococci are relatively high indicating marginal activity. A limited number of clinical trials have been performed using oral fusidic acid and although all have methodological problems the difference in susceptibility of these two organisms is apparent. The end of study cure rates for these studies were 91-99% for S. aureus and 75-85% for S. pyogenes. Topical therapy has been used in a number of forms and for different skin infections. Comparative studies have been conducted with mupirocin, trimethoprim/polymixin cream, hydrogen peroxide and combination steroid preparations. For most of these studies fusidic acid was equivalent to the comparator agent except where there was a proven S. pyogenes infection. Studies with topical fusidic acid have also been reported in specific disease states such as acne, erythrasma, and abscesses with good results.
Insights
Fusidic acid shows high efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus skin infections but limited effectiveness against Streptococcus pyogenes. Clinical trials reveal cure rates of 91-99% for S. aureus and 75-85% for S. pyogenes.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Microbiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes.
- Fusidic acid exhibits potent in vitro activity against S. aureus but demonstrates marginal activity against S. pyogenes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical efficacy of fusidic acid in treating skin and soft tissue infections.
- To compare the effectiveness of fusidic acid against S. aureus and S. pyogenes.
Main Methods:
- Review of in vitro data and clinical trials on oral and topical fusidic acid.
- Comparison of fusidic acid efficacy against S. aureus and S. pyogenes based on cure rates.
- Analysis of comparative studies with other topical agents for various skin conditions.
Main Results:
- Oral fusidic acid demonstrated high cure rates (91-99%) for S. aureus infections but lower rates (75-85%) for S. pyogenes infections.
- Topical fusidic acid showed comparable efficacy to other agents, except in cases of S. pyogenes infections.
- Positive outcomes were reported for topical fusidic acid in treating acne, erythrasma, and abscesses.
Conclusions:
- Fusidic acid is highly effective for S. aureus SSTIs but less so for S. pyogenes SSTIs.
- Topical fusidic acid offers a viable treatment option for specific skin infections, with varying efficacy depending on the causative pathogen.
More Related Videos
11:59Isolation of Lipoprotein Particles from Chicken Egg Yolk for the Study of Bacterial Pathogen Fatty Acid Incorporation into Membrane Phospholipids
Published on: May 15, 2019
04:09Development and Characterization of Fusidic Acid-Loaded Alginate-Aloe vera Based Hydrogel Film
Published on: December 13, 2024
Related Concept Videos
The Skin Microbiota
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Acne Infection
Candidiasis
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Antifungal Agents