Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Successful intelligence: finding a balance.

Sternberg1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|October 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On Yellow Fever.

Transactions. Epidemiological Society of London·2018
Same author

The contribution of the Army to the fight against venereal disease in the United States after the war.

La Prophylaxie antivenerienne·2010
Same author

Difficulty in defecation; mass in buttock [benign teratoid tumor].

Case reports. Children's Memorial Hospital (Chicago, Ill.)·2010
Same author

Anorexia; vomiting; convulsions [congenital urethral valve].

Case reports. Children's Memorial Hospital (Chicago, Ill.)·2010
Same author

Cyanosis and retarded development [atresia of pulmonary artery: absence of pulmonary valve; survival to 3-1/2 years].

Case reports. Children's Memorial Hospital (Chicago, Ill.)·2010
Same author

Generalized swelling.

Case reports. Children's Memorial Hospital (Chicago, Ill.)·2010
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Theories on human intelligence, general ability (g), and multiple intelligences lack rigorous empirical testing. A balanced approach is needed to scientifically study intelligence

Area of Science:

  • Psychological science
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The scientific study of human intelligence is challenged by socio-political influences and inadequate empirical validation.
  • Historical research in intelligence has oscillated between focusing on general ability (g) and multiple intelligences, with limitations in both.
  • General ability (g) theories often use restricted samples and limited data analysis, while multiple intelligences theories lack empirical testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the empirical standing of prominent theories of human intelligence.
  • To advocate for a balanced, empirically rigorous approach to studying the multifaceted nature of intelligence.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of existing literature on general intelligence (g) and multiple intelligences theories.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of common methodologies and data analysis techniques employed in intelligence research.
  • Argumentative synthesis to propose a path forward for empirical intelligence research.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant empirical limitations identified in both general ability (g) and multiple intelligences frameworks.
    • General ability (g) research often suffers from restricted participant pools, materials, and analytical methods.
    • Multiple intelligences theories have historically been subjected to minimal empirical scrutiny.

    Conclusions:

    • A need exists for a middle-ground approach in intelligence research that acknowledges its complexity.
    • Future research must prioritize robust empirical testing to validate theories of human intelligence.
    • Integrating diverse conceptions of intelligence with rigorous scientific methodology is crucial for advancing the field.